Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Thursday May 24 2018, @05:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the s/(CC)/U\1-U/g dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow3941

In an interview just prior to leaving the FCC this month, former Commissioner Mignon Clyburn took aim at the agency where she worked for nearly nine years, saying it has abandoned its mission to safeguard consumers and protect their privacy and speech.

Clyburn, a net neutrality proponent who served as interim FCC chief in 2013, equated the FCC's mission to the Starfleet Prime Directive, saying the agency's top priority is to ensure "affordable, efficient, and effective" access to communications—a directive it has effectively deserted under the new administration, working instead to advance the causes of "last-mile monopolies."

Clyburn spoke to Ars Technica's Jon Brodkin during a phone interview shortly before she left the agency this month.

"I'm an old Trekkie," she said. "I go back to my core, my prime directive of putting consumers first."

Clyburn said that, whereas some of her colleagues shied away from their role as a government regulator, she had embraced it, particularly when it came to internet service providers (ISPs).

"Let's face it," she told Ars, ISPs are "last-mile monopolies."

"In an ideal world, we wouldn't need regulation," Clyburn continued. "We don't live in an ideal world, all markets are not competitive, and when that is the case, that is why agencies like the FCC were constructed. We are here as a substitute for competition."

Source: https://gizmodo.com/fcc-commissioner-says-the-agency-is-a-shill-for-isps-as-1826203464


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Sulla on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:21PM (3 children)

    by Sulla (5173) on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:21PM (#683690) Journal

    You are correct in my use of the word nationalization. I would want this to be done at the local government level and not at the federal level.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:27PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:27PM (#683697)

    The local governments granted those monopolies, and ultimately control them.

    Comcast, et al., already are de fact contractors for governmental infrastructure.

    What you hate is the coercive nature of government.

    • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:57PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:57PM (#683717)

      As a contractor, they would only have one customer to bill. They would not bill individual homes.

      They would also not own the equipment.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:56PM (#683751)

        The government contracts to them the customer administrivia as well.

        Alternatively, you can just view them as being even more governmental in nature.