Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Thursday May 24 2018, @05:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the s/(CC)/U\1-U/g dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow3941

In an interview just prior to leaving the FCC this month, former Commissioner Mignon Clyburn took aim at the agency where she worked for nearly nine years, saying it has abandoned its mission to safeguard consumers and protect their privacy and speech.

Clyburn, a net neutrality proponent who served as interim FCC chief in 2013, equated the FCC's mission to the Starfleet Prime Directive, saying the agency's top priority is to ensure "affordable, efficient, and effective" access to communications—a directive it has effectively deserted under the new administration, working instead to advance the causes of "last-mile monopolies."

Clyburn spoke to Ars Technica's Jon Brodkin during a phone interview shortly before she left the agency this month.

"I'm an old Trekkie," she said. "I go back to my core, my prime directive of putting consumers first."

Clyburn said that, whereas some of her colleagues shied away from their role as a government regulator, she had embraced it, particularly when it came to internet service providers (ISPs).

"Let's face it," she told Ars, ISPs are "last-mile monopolies."

"In an ideal world, we wouldn't need regulation," Clyburn continued. "We don't live in an ideal world, all markets are not competitive, and when that is the case, that is why agencies like the FCC were constructed. We are here as a substitute for competition."

Source: https://gizmodo.com/fcc-commissioner-says-the-agency-is-a-shill-for-isps-as-1826203464


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:30PM (9 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:30PM (#683700)

    So... what could your point possibly be?

    Your "THERE SHOULD BE A LAW!!!!111" screams are useless; your own system already fails, and yet you have to keep paying for its institutions just the same.

  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:40PM (7 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 24 2018, @07:40PM (#683702) Journal

    There should be a law. People should obey the law. The laws should be justly enacted and enforced. Corruption should be illegal. Bzzzzzzt! I think I just found the failure mode!

    No society will ever be perfect. Ours has its deep flaws. But mostly it had been better than most other forms of government. However our system was doomed once we got to where only the corrupt can come into power to continue the corruption at the behest and sponsorship of powerful meg corporations. The founding fathers could never have imagined such concentrations of wealth and power that are the modern mega corporation. Otherwise they would have spelled out protections. Even so, they did give us many protections. It's just that they've been "worked around".

    Part of it is to keep the population ignorant and deeply divided.

    --
    People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:33PM (5 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:33PM (#683738)

      I think we need to stop engaging, either the AC is a troll or an idiot. All the pitfalls have been pointed out to their 100% voluntary everything, yet they ignore those and just repeat the same bullshit. So either a troll pushing some type of agenda / lulz, or an idiot. Either way, probably best to ignore and start marking as spam any duplicated or off-topic posts.

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Thursday May 24 2018, @11:20PM (4 children)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 24 2018, @11:20PM (#683799) Journal

        So either a troll pushing some type of agenda

        The agenda: let the powerful and weak fight unrestricted by any law.
        I wonder which side stands to benefit from such a position? Which side can pay shills to obnoxiously push it ?

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @11:49PM (3 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @11:49PM (#683813)

          A contract is an agreement between 2 parties, and such an agreement must be made in advance of interaction.

          • (Score: 4, Insightful) by c0lo on Friday May 25 2018, @12:03AM (2 children)

            by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 25 2018, @12:03AM (#683819) Journal

            And a contract between a weak and a powerful will always be equatable, no guarantees are necessary.

            --
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 25 2018, @01:25AM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 25 2018, @01:25AM (#683839)

              ... especially when you're tugging at the robes and begging for help from some hideous creature like Uncle Sam.

              You want guarantees? Associate with enforcers and collective bargainers for whom you have respect, and include them in your contracts.

              • (Score: 4, Insightful) by c0lo on Friday May 25 2018, @02:16AM

                by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 25 2018, @02:16AM (#683857) Journal

                There's no such thing as a "guarantee" especially when you're tugging at the robes and begging for help from some hideous creature like Uncle Sam ${multinational_corporation}.

                As little as it may be, do you want bread on your table or not?
                Here's the 1000+ pages contract our contractual experts** drafted.
                Why, there are some provisions to defend your interest, see page X where we agree any arbitration will go through "Z-arbitration Ltd".
                Yes, it's our subsidiary (how did you know?), but how's that relevant?
                Listen, you either sign the contract now or take your freedom and start foraging in garbage dumps.

                ---
                ** no, in the absence of laws, there's no such thing as a lawyer.

                --
                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:51PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:51PM (#683748)

      You're a fool who pulls crap out of his ass.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 24 2018, @08:14PM (#683729)

    You are just too fucking dumb. If I had the patience I would 100% go collect all your posts and make a website out of them. Lets see, herpderpree.com IS available!