Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday May 25 2018, @10:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the pop(); dept.

[NB: A unicorn "is a privately held startup company valued at over $1 billion." --Ed.]

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

In case you missed it, the peak in the tech unicorn bubble already has been reached. And it's going to be all downhill from here. Massive losses are coming in venture capital-funded start-ups that are, in some cases, as much as 50 percent overvalued.

The age of the unicorn likely peaked a few years ago. In 2014 there were 42 new unicorns in the United States; in 2015 there were 43. The unicorn market hasn't reached that number again. In 2017, 33 new U.S. companies achieved unicorn status from a total of 53 globally. This year there have been 11 new unicorns, according to PitchBook data as of May 15, but these numbers tend to move around, and I believe the 279 unicorns recorded globally in late February by TechCrunch was the peak, where the start-up bubble was stretched to its limit.

A recent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research concludes that, on average, unicorns are roughly 50 percent overvalued. The research, conducted by Will Gornall at the University of British Columbia and Ilya Strebulaev of Stanford, examined 135 unicorns. Of those 135, the researchers estimate that nearly half, or 65, should be more fairly valued at less than $1 billion.

In 1999 the average life of a tech company before it went public was four years. Today it is 11 years. The new dynamic is the increased amount of private capital available to unicorns. Investors new to the VC game, including hedge funds and mutual funds, came in when the Jobs Act started to get rid of investor protections in 2012, because there were fewer IPOs occurring.

These investors focus on growing the unicorn customer base, not turning a profit. New regulatory conditions, including wildly separate share classes, which give some shareholders significantly more rights than others, have resulted in a danger of widespread overvaluation. Some shareholders have voting, rights to assets, rights to dividends, rights to inspect records. Snap won't give any shareholders voting rights, and the shares have steadily declined since the IPO.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/22/tech-bubble-is-larger-than-in-2000-and-the-end-is-coming.html

Also at MarketWatch.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday May 25 2018, @04:22PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday May 25 2018, @04:22PM (#684071)

    Compared to the dot-com bust of ~2000, this is mild. Only 50% overvalued? Number of unicorns decreasing by some gradual curve per year? This is a steel belted radial with a slow leak compared to 2000. 2000 was a thin latex water balloon that snapped.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Friday May 25 2018, @10:06PM (1 child)

    by frojack (1554) on Friday May 25 2018, @10:06PM (#684235) Journal

    Not only that but they're all privately held so who cares? it's not like the stock market's going to be affected by this, and that was the problem back in the 2000s.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Saturday May 26 2018, @04:25PM

      by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 26 2018, @04:25PM (#684574)

      Hope you didn't own stock in Cisco or a zillion other suppliers back in 2000. Those hardware invoices aren't getting paid after bankruptcy...