Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday May 27 2018, @04:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the boring-news dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

We have a lot of respect for the hackers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). When their stuff has a problem, it is often millions of miles away and yet they often find a way to fix it anyway. Case in point is the Curiosity Mars rover. Back in 2016, the probe's rock drill broke. This is critical because one of the main things the rover does is drill into rock samples, collect the powder and subject it to analysis. JPL announced they had devised a way to successfully drill again.

The drill failed after fifteen uses. It uses two stabilizers to steady itself against the target rock. A failed motor prevents the drill bit from retracting and extending between the stabilizers. Of course, sending a repair tech 60 million miles is not in the budget, so they had to find another way. You can see a video about the way they found, below.

Source: https://hackaday.com/2018/05/25/nasa-remotely-hacks-curiositys-rock-drill/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:14PM (6 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:14PM (#684882)

    It's not a hack if something you built breaks and you make do with less.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:33PM (#684893)

    It's exactly the kind of fix that would be called a "hack" on Hackaday to justify their stupid site name.

    *reads summary*

    Well, crap. It is Hackaday.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:39PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:39PM (#684902)

    Exactly.

    Nowhere in the linked story from JPL does the word "hack" appear. However, the linked HackADay story uses the term and also claims that JPL called it "MacGyvering," although that term does not appear in either the linked JPL story or in the video.

    If I were one of the people at JPL who worked on this problem, I would be insulted at the use of the word "hack."

    • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:46PM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 27 2018, @07:46PM (#684905)

      Hackaday is a shitty blog for wannabe hardware hackers to read all about projects they are incapable of doing.

      You want to read about real hardware hacks, follow the journal of famous transsexual hacker cafebabe right here on soylent.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 28 2018, @12:04AM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 28 2018, @12:04AM (#684949)

        Oh yes they are so much worse than this site that degenerates into arguing about nazis (who are no longer a threat) and trump (who has about 0 effect in your life). Yeah, those scumbags talking about cool projects and making things. Maybe if they had more russian collusion stories the world would be rainbows, lollipops, and sparkly glitter.

        We left SD behind because of that sort of shit. Hackaday is banging out what SD *USED* to do. What I thought we were going to do here. Instead Hacker news/hackaday has WAY better discussions and basically is what SD used to be. This site is just a fractured poor mirrored splinter of SD that thinks identity politics is more fun to discuss.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 28 2018, @12:34AM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 28 2018, @12:34AM (#684954)

          To be fair, Trump's cock up your ass feels fantastic.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 28 2018, @03:54PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 28 2018, @03:54PM (#685175)

            Thank you for making my point.