Study Puts Puerto Rico Death Toll From Hurricane Maria Near 5,000
Perhaps 5,000 people died in Puerto Rico in 2017 for reasons related to September's Hurricane Maria, according to a study that dismisses the official death toll of 64 as "a substantial underestimate."
A research team led by scientists at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health didn't simply attempt to count dead bodies in the wake of the powerful storm. Instead, they surveyed randomly chosen households and asked the occupants about their experiences.
From that approach, they concluded that between Sept. 20 and Dec. 31, 2017, there were 4,645 "excess deaths" — that is, deaths that would not have occurred if the island hadn't been plunged into a prolonged disaster following the devastating storm.
But the estimate isn't as precise as the figure implies. The researchers calculate there is a 95 percent likelihood the death toll was somewhere between about 800 and 8,500 people. They say about 5,000 is a likely figure.
Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria (open, DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1803972) (DX)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 30 2018, @05:58PM (7 children)
What makes you think that is what was measured here? Did you look at the survey before posting this?
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday May 30 2018, @06:11PM (6 children)
What makes you think that is what was measured here? Did you look at the survey before posting this?
Yes, I did.
That link I provided is a citation from the paper.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 30 2018, @07:02PM (5 children)
So you think if someone couldn't get a medication for a few days and then dies months later the cdc definition you quoted says this should be counted as a death due to hurricane? Because that is what is counted in this survey.
(Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 30 2018, @07:18PM
Ah, look under the "Time periods" heading here (can't copy paste it...):
https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/28/6/1124/771525 [oup.com]
So they punted on it, leaving it up to whoever fills out the report.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday May 30 2018, @07:21PM (3 children)
Because that is what is counted in this survey.
So you're saying the just ignore the answer to this one?
DELAY IN MEDICAL CARE
6) Did the hurricane lead to any of the following problems among members in your household that
didn’t exist before the hurricane? (If so, for how many days?)
(Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 30 2018, @07:30PM (2 children)
Yep, the definitions are worthless without a timeframe, literally anything that someone dies of after surviving a disaster could be linked to it. It is all up to the opinions of medical examiners for this system to make sense.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday May 30 2018, @07:59PM (1 child)
Interesting how the timeframe can be too long while simultaneously not existing.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 30 2018, @08:58PM
The timeframe does not exist in the guidelines, the person filling out the form (usually a medical examiner, in this case family members) can use whatever they want.