Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Monday June 04 2018, @10:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the remember-when-a-hard-disk-held-20MB? dept.

Samsung Unveils 32 GB DDR4-2666 SO-DIMMs

Samsung on Wednesday introduced its first consumer products based on its 16 Gb DDR4 memory chips demonstrated earlier this year. The new SO-DIMMs are aimed at high-performance notebooks that benefit from both speed and capacity of memory modules.

Samsung's new 32 GB DDR4 SO-DIMMs based on 16 Gb DDR4 memory ICs (integrated circuits) are rated for a 2666 MT/s data transfer rate at 1.2 V. Because the 16 Gb memory chips are made using Samsung's 10 nm-class process technology, the new module is claimed to be 39% more energy efficient than the company's previous-gen 16 GB SO-DIMM based on 20 nm-class ICs. According to Samsung, a laptop equipped with 64 GB of new memory consumes 4.578 W in active mode, whereas a notebook outfitted with 64 GB of previous-gen DDR4 consumes 7.456 W in active mode.

Insert obligatory ECC comment here.

Samsung press release. Also at Tom's Hardware and DigiTimes.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FakeBeldin on Monday June 04 2018, @11:26AM (1 child)

    by FakeBeldin (3360) on Monday June 04 2018, @11:26AM (#688321) Journal

    How prone would these chips be to rowhammer attacks [wikipedia.org]?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by FatPhil on Monday June 04 2018, @02:58PM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Monday June 04 2018, @02:58PM (#688389) Homepage
    Given that later generation DDR3 chips mitegated against rowhammer, you'd hope that the same defences are in place, as the actual tech/protocol differences between DDR3 and DDR4 are minimal, it's more of a physical upgrade.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves