Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 04 2018, @10:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the remember-when-a-hard-disk-held-20MB? dept.

Samsung Unveils 32 GB DDR4-2666 SO-DIMMs

Samsung on Wednesday introduced its first consumer products based on its 16 Gb DDR4 memory chips demonstrated earlier this year. The new SO-DIMMs are aimed at high-performance notebooks that benefit from both speed and capacity of memory modules.

Samsung's new 32 GB DDR4 SO-DIMMs based on 16 Gb DDR4 memory ICs (integrated circuits) are rated for a 2666 MT/s data transfer rate at 1.2 V. Because the 16 Gb memory chips are made using Samsung's 10 nm-class process technology, the new module is claimed to be 39% more energy efficient than the company's previous-gen 16 GB SO-DIMM based on 20 nm-class ICs. According to Samsung, a laptop equipped with 64 GB of new memory consumes 4.578 W in active mode, whereas a notebook outfitted with 64 GB of previous-gen DDR4 consumes 7.456 W in active mode.

Insert obligatory ECC comment here.

Samsung press release. Also at Tom's Hardware and DigiTimes.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Monday June 04 2018, @02:26PM (3 children)

    It doesn't just apply to processors, it's about *processes*, so even banks of dumb memory cells count.

    The "10nm-class" is being defined as having "twice the density" (thus scaled by area, not linearly) as "20nm-class", which is consistent with the marketting scheme they've had for about a decade now. But the previous chips came out 4 years ago. That's half the rate of density-doubling that has been remarkably consistent until pretty recently, it does provide evidence that we really are beginning to stretch the limits of lithography. And whilst improvements are being promised, we don't know how quickly they'll appear, and even then quite soon the current technology will be hitting blockages put in the way by the laws of physics themselves. And I don't see any viable replacement tech.

    Moore's Law's not dead, but it looks like it's on crutches. It's utterly amazing that his observation held so true for so long, to be honest.

    I'm not too worried, there's still an enormous amount of waste caused by a dogged attachment to legacy architectures. Radical new processor designs could save the day, or at least slow down the rot for a while. And maybe software bloat will follow a J curve rather than an S curve, and we all strive for "lightweight" again, rather than "feature packed".
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 04 2018, @03:37PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 04 2018, @03:37PM (#688406) Journal

    High Bandwidth Memory basically proves that it's not too hard to stack memory (unlike CPU cores). So there is a path up. HBM is more expensive, sure, but at least it exists.

    https://www.extremetech.com/gaming/234333-hbm-everywhere-samsung-wants-hbm3-low-cost-options-to-blow-the-doors-off-the-memory-market [extremetech.com]

    https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SamsungHBM3.jpg [extremetech.com]

    RAM prices are massively inflated right now. It would be great to get HBM-like specs at those prices.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday June 04 2018, @03:58PM (1 child)

      You have to remember that Moore's Law does take bang-per-buck into account. So expensive esoteric tech doesn't count until it becomes the mainstream commodity tech. And still, 2.5D doesn't seem like much more than keeping it alive for one or two more generations. I'm curious how low they think "much less than 1.2V" will be - I'm a guy who remembers when 3.3V TTL was considered Low Voltage, and heading south from 1.2V again pushes you into one of those darned annoying laws of physics. Of course, improved bandwidth and decreased energy disipation are very welcome improvements, but they'll not address the bloat issue.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves