Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday June 05 2018, @03:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the sticking-it-to-the-consumer dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow8317

Car makers like Jaguar Land Rover and Peugeot have been accused of using special software to raise spare parts prices.

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/04/car-makers-used-software-to-raise-spare-parts-prices/

Ever had the nagging suspicion that your car's manufacturer was charging outrageous prices for parts simply because it could? Software might be to blame. Reuters has obtained documents from a lawsuit indicating that Jaguar Land Rover, Peugeot, Renault and other automakers have been using Accenture software (Partneo) that recommended price increases for spare parts based on "perceived value." If a brand badge or other component looked expensive, Partneo would suggest raising the price up to a level that drivers would still be willing to pay. It would even distinguish parts based on whether or not there was "pricing supervision" over certain parts (say, from insurance companies or focused publications) to avoid sparking an outcry.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:02PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:02PM (#688961)

    No, I am certain the terms I want are capitalism and socialism, not anarchy. The failure mode of capitalism you identify, monopoly, is the polar opposite of anarchy.

    fwiw, I am in agreement with Mr. Vim that government is a violently imposed monopoly.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Offtopic=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:08PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:08PM (#688966)

    Government will always be a violently imposed monopoly and the only solution is to keep governments as small / local as possible. By definition they are a violently imposed monopoly, how else do you prevent someone from doing something the majority deems unacceptable? Make all humans angels first, then we can discuss more idealistic forms of governance.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06 2018, @12:07PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06 2018, @12:07PM (#689272)

      Read some Kropotkin.

  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:12PM (4 children)

    The failure mode of capitalism you identify, monopoly, is the polar opposite of anarchy.

    Only in the case of a government imposed monopoly. Anarchy put no barriers against natural or collusion-based monopolies, only those created by a government. So, yeah, you need to pick your terms better.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:52PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2018, @06:52PM (#688996)

      How is a government imposed monopoly different from monopolies imposed by other means?

    • (Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday June 05 2018, @09:32PM (1 child)

      by sjames (2882) on Tuesday June 05 2018, @09:32PM (#689037) Journal

      As soon as someone manages a monopoly on an essential resource, the anarchy party is over [wikipedia.org].