Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday June 05 2018, @10:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the perhaps-he-just-forgot dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow8317

Facebook is facing questions about data sharing with Apple, Amazon and other device makers.

Facebook may have violated a 2011 FTC consent degree by giving Apple, Samsung, BlackBerry and other device makers detailed access to user data, according to the New York Times. The social network struck partnerships with at least 60 device makers so that they could offer messaging, "Like" buttons and other features without the need for an app. However, an NYT reporter found that the BlackBerry Hub, for one, was able to glean private data from 556 of his friends, including their religious and political leanings and events they planned to attend.

It could also access other information, including unique identifiers, on 294,258 friends of his friends. The finding appears to fly in the face of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's comments to Congress in March, when he said that "every piece of content that you share on Facebook you own. You have complete control over who sees it and how you share it." Facebook started phasing out the program in April, but it's still in effect for many of the partners.

In a piece entitled "Why We Disagree with The New York Times," Facebook pushed back strongly against the claims. It said that it created APIs for Amazon, Apple, Blackberry, HTC, Microsoft, Samsung and other device makers so that they could offer Facebook on their operating systems at a time when there were no apps or app stores. "All these partnerships were built on a common interest -- the desire for people to be able to use Facebook whatever their device or operating system," wrote VP of Product Partnerships Ime Archibong.

Facebook controlled the APIs tightly, and said the partners signed agreements that prevented information from being used for anything other than to "recreate Facebook-like experience." It also said that the features couldn't be used with permission and that its engineering teams approved all of them. "Contrary to claims by the New York Times, friends' information, like photos, was only accessible on devices when people made a decision to share their information with those friends," Facebook said. "We are not aware of any abuse by these companies."

Some critics don't agree with Facebook's assessment of the situation, however. A former Facebook employee who led third-party ad and privacy compliance, Sandy Parakilas, noted that the program was controversial even within Facebook. "This was flagged internally as a privacy issue," he said. "It is shocking that this practice may still continue six years later, and it appears to contradict Facebook's testimony to Congress that all friend permissions were disabled."

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/04/facebook-gave-device-makers-user-data/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Wednesday June 06 2018, @12:37AM (1 child)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Wednesday June 06 2018, @12:37AM (#689088) Journal

    Really, people should understand that anything they post on the Internet is public. Potentially, it will be remembered forever. Who knows, maybe 3 centuries from now Internet archaeologists will be pouring over all these comments from the dawn of the Internet, studying how fads come and go, how culture and language changes, and so on.

    Meantime, anyone who posts something so horrible it permanently ruins their reputation is going to have to live with it or take steps such as move to another town, maybe another state, change names, and change all their online accounts. People have been doing the first 2 or 3 for decades. Now and then I've heard of high school kids having to change schools and school districts because they were being ostracized over some incident or other, and often it wasn't even their fault. High school kids can be vicious that way.

    I've never been keen about having a Facebook account, and use it as little as possible, but on this it seems to me that privacy advocates are asking too much. Basically they want an "evil bit". Share my posts with my friends, unless it would be evil, then keep my privacy.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06 2018, @05:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 06 2018, @05:05PM (#689392)

    People need to understand much more.

    It's not like somebody confesses murder on social media and then is surprised something happens to him. It's the everyday perfectly innocent things you do, right down to how often and how fast you move your pointer. Basically anything at all because when you have hundreds of millions of samples, you get to statistically correlate things. And one-in-a-million things literally happen every second. Suddenly your sexual preferences, your financial status, your health situation etc are public knowledge. If you find this incredible look for studies by Michal Kosinski in this very field.

    That's the part Joe Bloggs should realize and accept. That's the price of free.