Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday June 05 2018, @10:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the perhaps-he-just-forgot dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow8317

Facebook is facing questions about data sharing with Apple, Amazon and other device makers.

Facebook may have violated a 2011 FTC consent degree by giving Apple, Samsung, BlackBerry and other device makers detailed access to user data, according to the New York Times. The social network struck partnerships with at least 60 device makers so that they could offer messaging, "Like" buttons and other features without the need for an app. However, an NYT reporter found that the BlackBerry Hub, for one, was able to glean private data from 556 of his friends, including their religious and political leanings and events they planned to attend.

It could also access other information, including unique identifiers, on 294,258 friends of his friends. The finding appears to fly in the face of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's comments to Congress in March, when he said that "every piece of content that you share on Facebook you own. You have complete control over who sees it and how you share it." Facebook started phasing out the program in April, but it's still in effect for many of the partners.

In a piece entitled "Why We Disagree with The New York Times," Facebook pushed back strongly against the claims. It said that it created APIs for Amazon, Apple, Blackberry, HTC, Microsoft, Samsung and other device makers so that they could offer Facebook on their operating systems at a time when there were no apps or app stores. "All these partnerships were built on a common interest -- the desire for people to be able to use Facebook whatever their device or operating system," wrote VP of Product Partnerships Ime Archibong.

Facebook controlled the APIs tightly, and said the partners signed agreements that prevented information from being used for anything other than to "recreate Facebook-like experience." It also said that the features couldn't be used with permission and that its engineering teams approved all of them. "Contrary to claims by the New York Times, friends' information, like photos, was only accessible on devices when people made a decision to share their information with those friends," Facebook said. "We are not aware of any abuse by these companies."

Some critics don't agree with Facebook's assessment of the situation, however. A former Facebook employee who led third-party ad and privacy compliance, Sandy Parakilas, noted that the program was controversial even within Facebook. "This was flagged internally as a privacy issue," he said. "It is shocking that this practice may still continue six years later, and it appears to contradict Facebook's testimony to Congress that all friend permissions were disabled."

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/04/facebook-gave-device-makers-user-data/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Mykl on Wednesday June 06 2018, @02:45AM (1 child)

    by Mykl (1112) on Wednesday June 06 2018, @02:45AM (#689121)

    All FB needed to succeed was to remain in front of everyone's faces - if they could increase the amount of time that their victims users stayed on FB by providing free API access to manufacturers, then it would be worth giving the API access away for free.

    Plus, it avoids those manufacturers coming up with ideas for competing services.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday June 06 2018, @03:00AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday June 06 2018, @03:00AM (#689132) Journal

    There is a little bit of wordplay going on here.

    If I am an ice cream vendor, and I give "free" samples now and then, are they really for really "free"? In actuality, I hope and expect that a lot of the recipients of the "free" ice cream will come back for more ice cream.

    On a larger scale, auto dealers like to advertise little freebies, such as "Tax Title and Tag free weekend". How many of us really believe that the dealer is paying for that out of his own pocket? He can only do that if he is overcharging us in the first place.

    In this particular case - FB "gave away" API's with certain expectations, which ultimately, translate into money.

    Yeah, there is "free", and there is "free".

    Your additional angle? Stifling potential competition? Yeah, I like that one too. That is an added bonus.