Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 06 2018, @10:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the own-worst-enemy dept.

"Alexander Berezin, a theoretical physicist at the National Research University of Electronic Technology in Russia, has proposed a new answer to Fermi's paradox — but he doesn't think you're going to like it. Because, if Berezin's hypothesis is correct, it could mean a future for humanity that's 'even worse than extinction.'

'What if,' Berezin wrote in a new paper posted March 27 to the preprint journal arxiv.org, 'the first life that reaches interstellar travel capability necessarily eradicates all competition to fuel its own expansion?'" foxnews.com/science/2018/06/04/aliens-are-real-but-humans-will-probably-kill-them-all-new-paper-says.html

In other words, could humanity's quest to discover intelligent life be directly responsible for obliterating that life outright? What if we are, unwittingly, the universe's bad guys?

And if you are not sure what the Fermi paradox is then the link should help, and there is a long explanation of that one in the article.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday June 06 2018, @06:44PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday June 06 2018, @06:44PM (#689470)

    we're pretty close to our full potential, there's not a lot we can discover that will open the universe to us

    People used to think man could never fly. Maybe Einstein missed some things.

    Well... it makes fairly dull science fiction to not imagine huge advances in technology / physical theory, and I don't doubt that we will find new and unimaginable things in the future, Einstein doubtlessly missed some things - but, if you posit that we are not alone, Fermi's paradox seems to back Einstein on the major point of "faster than light travel doesn't happen for big things."

    It was buried in the general flash and dazzle, but the Altered Carbon proposition of "needlecasting" to other worlds (also presented as "Transfer Transit" in Dark Matter, and various other places) seems at the moment to be as likely a way to travel the stars as any, slow ship to establish endpoints, then FTL transfer of information. Certainly, once the light speed barrier is broken, it should be easier to transmit information than the whole Starship Enterprise and crew - but the great novelists of the past (thinking Joseph Conrad at the moment) did a lot with the limited space and cast of characters onboard a ship at sea, so it's not surprising that we get a lot of movies doing the same.

    On a similar tack, unless you go in for the conspiracy theory plots where the master manipulators operate deftly behind the scenes with nearly the whole world oblivious to their presence, time travel would seem to be similarly "proven" impossible at least from the future back to our time, simply by the lack of observable evidence of time travelers. Lots of fiction written around big secrets hidden from the world at large, in the last 50 years I have not yet been impressed that such a thing is possible, based on the secrets that have been revealed. But, of course, if they are really good at keeping their secrets, then we wouldn't know, would we?

    Same goes for the aliens - most wouldn't bother to stop and talk with dogs in France while they were there, but neither would they ALL bother to keep their presence a secret from the dogs while in town, would they? And, as for whether they would go to France in the first place, if we're anything to judge by, we've set foot on every scrap of dry land on this rock by now, most of it just about as soon as we were able to do so. If water-carbon based aliens had highly capable vehicles to travel in, surely they'd at least drop by a goldilocks world to have a look?

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday June 06 2018, @07:37PM (1 child)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday June 06 2018, @07:37PM (#689498)

    Suffice to say I'm not holding my breath.

    I liked how they explained it in Jack McDevitt's [wikipedia.org] Academy series: there's a series of nanotech "clouds" traveling in waves through the galaxy killing off civilizations they run across every 4000 years. Without wishing to spoil, the why of the situation ends up rather blackly humorous.

    The series also posits some other explanations, like how less-technological civilizations may be more resilient to catastrophes. If we got hit by one of those massive solar flares and 90% of the electronics on Earth got fried, that would make for some interesting times. Or how until we learned to split the atom, it was a lot harder to generally stomp life on earth.

    And the whole thing is a bit "out there" because we basically know zero of the terms of the Drake Equation with any certainty, right?

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday June 06 2018, @07:39PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday June 06 2018, @07:39PM (#689501)

      there's a series of nanotech "clouds" traveling in waves through the galaxy killing off civilizations they run across

      Admittedly this sounds like a really juvenile plot, but that's partly because I'm summarizing it so much. The obvious questions are whether they're natural or artificial, if the latter who's sending them and why, if they're being sent are they actually intended to wipe out intelligent life, etc.

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"