SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Gizmodo writes that FCC emails show that the agency spread lies to bolster false DDoS attack claims. Their system became overwhelmed in early 2017 after John Oliver directed his audience to flood the agency with comments supporting net neutrality. A similar surge had happened for similar reasons back in 2014. However, the current FCC team appears to have lied about both occasions.
Internal emails reviewed by Gizmodo lay bare the agency's efforts to counter rife speculation that senior officials manufactured a cyberattack, allegedly to explain away technical problems plaguing the FCC's comment system amid its high-profile collection of public comments on a controversial and since-passed proposal to overturn federal net neutrality rules.
The FCC has been unwilling or unable to produce any evidence an attack occurred—not to the reporters who've requested and even sued over it, and not to U.S. lawmakers who've demanded to see it. Instead, the agency conducted a quiet campaign to bolster its cyberattack story with the aid of friendly and easily duped reporters, chiefly by spreading word of an earlier cyberattack that its own security staff say never happened.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by RS3 on Thursday June 07 2018, @03:09PM (8 children)
Yes. If it was up to me, they'd be held to a higher standard of conduct because of the power they have and its affect on society.
If it is, nobody with power seems to care.
Not going to matter. It's the big elephant in the middle of the room.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday June 07 2018, @04:35PM (7 children)
Remember when lying politicians were a bad thing?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
(Score: 2) by RS3 on Thursday June 07 2018, @05:27PM (3 children)
Yes, I think I do, but now I wonder if it was all smoke and mirrors, and now with much more communication (including the Internet, cell-phone video, etc.) the lies are being exposed. The real question is: who is going to do what? And when?
Someday when I have lots of free time I'll do some historical research and see if the Founding Fathers had this much difficulty with lying and corruption.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday June 07 2018, @05:29PM (2 children)
No, they're just lying a LOT more, and a lot more brazenly.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 07 2018, @08:15PM (1 child)
The 1980s were a decade of lies. There wasnt much lying 1992-2000, then a lot of lying 2000-2008, then there was a hiatus until 2016 at which point the lying returned with a vengence.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday June 07 2018, @09:00PM
Hmmm....there's a correlation there. I wonder what it is!
(Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday June 07 2018, @06:49PM (2 children)
Any political leader who has ever had recorded what they said has been at least somewhat a liar. Even political leaders with a reputation for honesty: "Honest" Abe Lincoln lied all the time, for instance.
And of course, a substantial portion of any modern company's staffing is professional liars [dilbert.com].
Heck, you probably lie too professionally. For example, most programmers, if asked the percentage complete for their portion of the project periodically will give answers that look something like: "50%", "90%", "95%", "96%", "98%", "99%", "99.5%", ...
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 2) by arslan on Friday June 08 2018, @03:12AM (1 child)
Huh? That's providing an estimate. There's a difference between doing an educated guess under the premise that everyone involved knowing it is as such vs. making statements that you know is not particularly true under the premise that you are expected to report the truth.
(Score: 2) by Thexalon on Friday June 08 2018, @02:38PM
Presumably, managers are using those estimates under the assumption that the describe something vaguely close to reality. The pattern I just described makes the "50%" not even remotely close.
A lot of programmers I've known give bogus estimates. Not just because of honest mistakes, either: If they give a bogus estimate, it looks like progress is being made and they're really close and management shouldn't cut off the project, while on many such occasions I know for a fact very little is being done.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.