Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday June 09 2018, @06:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the just-need-bigger-books-held-further-away dept.

New research led by scientists at Cardiff University and the University of Bristol found that people who spend more time in education are more likely to develop near-sightedness. Specifically, researchers found that for every year a person spends in education — where they are likely to spend more time reading and typing on computers — there is a rise in myopic refractive error of 0.27 diopters, a diopter being a standard measure of the optical power of a lens. An estimated 68,000 participants were examined using the "Mendelian randomization" (MR), approach which is often used to examine causal effect of a disease in observational studies.

http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/news/view/1199570-study-suggests-education-causes-short-sightedness

https://www.salon.com/2018/06/07/theres-a-scientific-reason-nerds-have-bad-eyesight/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 09 2018, @06:36AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 09 2018, @06:36AM (#690712)

    This sorta bs research tell us to reduce research funding. Academia needs to figure some shit out.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Saturday June 09 2018, @06:52PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 09 2018, @06:52PM (#690894) Journal

    Posts like this are why we need an "idiot" moderation tag. Sort of the opposite of "insightful". It's not a troll and it's not flamebait, but it's stupid. Overrated would also work, but you can't use that until the post has some other moderation.

    OTOH, I strongly suspect that the person who wrote the article didn't understand the research, or what statistical correlation actually means. I suspect the researchers were appalled at the form taken by the "popularization" of their study. But PR flacks are PR flacks, even if they work for a university.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.