Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday June 10 2018, @01:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the getting-tougher dept.

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666

The FCC has approved new rules expressly banning unauthorized charges on phone bills, a practice that was already illegal under federal law but never formally codified within the agency. It’s the first time the commission is adopting an explicit rule.

The new rules ban unexpected phone bill charges, also known as “cramming” many services that a customer didn’t ask for onto a bill. The rules also ban the practice of tricking a customer into switching phone carriers. From now on, if a company is found to have used deception to obtain your consent to switch carriers, your consent will be deemed invalid.

Changes are also being made to how third-party verification services, which are supposed to validate a sale or carrier switch, confirm that a customer really intended to take action. The third-party verification process will no longer need user approval for every service purchased, in order to save customers time and streamline the process. It’s a change that’s supposed to be helpful, but it sounds like it could lead to unexpected charges when you aren’t paying attention. Finally, carriers that abuse third-party verification, such as by editing out parts of a customer’s phone call with a third party to make it sound like an approval to switch carriers, will be suspended from using them for several years.

Source: https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/8/17441426/fcc-bans-unauthorized-phone-bill-charges


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 11 2018, @01:19PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 11 2018, @01:19PM (#691377)

    is that legal cause some employers try the same thing and find that yes their employee can take them to court usually on the grounds that said contract is not valid