A hi-tech padlock secured with a fingerprint can be opened by anyone with a smartphone, security researchers have found.
On its website, Tapplock is described as the "world's first smart fingerprint padlock".
But researchers said it took just 45 minutes to find a way to unlock any Tapplock.
[...] The "major flaw" in its design is that the unlock key for the device is easily discovered because it is generated from the Bluetooth Low Energy ID that is broadcast by the lock.
Anyone with a smartphone would be able to pick up this key if they scanned for Bluetooth devices when close to a Tapplock.
Using this key in conjunction with commands broadcast by the Tapplock would let attackers successfully open any one they found, said Mr Tierney.
In response, Tapplock said in a statement that it was issuing a software update.
-- submitted from IRC
(Score: 4, Informative) by JoeMerchant on Friday June 15 2018, @02:55PM (2 children)
Back in the 1980s, I bought a "magic magnet key" padlock, for about $8 - which, considering I was making $3.35/hr at the time was probably more expensive than this hype-tech lock would be for me today. That padlock still works - they keys are made with a combination of I think 4 magnets in random polarizations (not a lot of combinations, but not a lot of people bought those locks, either). Magnets haven't depolarized, keys still work to open it, and it's solid as any other padlock you'll see, much more solid than the dial ones they sell for $8 today. Mine has a round face with a round faced key pad in the middle of it, I don't see any similar ones on Google Images, though there are new magnetic key locks out there.
🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 2) by FakeBeldin on Sunday June 17 2018, @05:53PM (1 child)
Couldn't resist.
At $3.35/hr, you would have had to work (almost) 2.4hrs, that is about 2 hours and 24 minutes.
This lock was originally going for $99. You'd have to be taking home $41.25/hr for that. That's $330/day, or $1650/wk, or $6600/4wks. Or, if you get paid for 52 weeks a year: $85,800/yr. That's *well* above the US's median salary for September 2017 ($59,039).
Conclusion: maybe it's cheaper for you than that old lock, but likely not by much.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday June 18 2018, @01:20AM
Well, there's some sliding scale on that - back in the 80s I had a shit job making minimum wage, whereas today I have an education and 25+ years experience, so I've moved up the scale a bit, even beyond "median." OTOH, I'm sole income provider for 4 people, so the money doesn't go as far as it used to, either...
🌻🌻 [google.com]