Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday June 16 2018, @09:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the electrifying-news dept.

Two soylentils have submitted stories about improvements in lithium battery storage capacity. The first focuses on the cathode while the second features improvements in the anode.

Tripling the Energy Storage of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Submitted via IRC for BoyceMagooglyMonkey

A collaboration led by scientists at the University of Maryland (UMD), the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory, and the U.S. Army Research Lab have developed and studied a new cathode material that could triple the energy density of lithium-ion battery electrodes. Their research was published on June 13 in Nature Communications.

"Lithium-ion batteries consist of an anode and a cathode," said Xiulin Fan, a scientist at UMD and one of the lead authors of the paper. "Compared to the large capacity of the commercial graphite anodes used in lithium-ion batteries, the capacity of the cathodes is far more limited. Cathode materials are always the bottleneck for further improving the energy density of lithium-ion batteries."

Scientists at UMD synthesized a new cathode material, a modified and engineered form of iron trifluoride (FeF3), which is composed of cost-effective and environmentally benign elements—iron and fluorine. Researchers have been interested in using chemical compounds like FeF3 in lithium-ion batteries because they offer inherently higher capacities than traditional cathode materials.

Source: https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=112885

Turbocharge For Lithium Batteries

A team of material researchers from Juelich, Munich, and Prague has succeeded in producing a composite material that is particularly suited for electrodes in lithium batteries. The nanocomposite material might help to significantly increase the storage capacity and lifetime of batteries as well as their charging speed. The researchers have published their findings in the journal Advanced Functional Materials.

"In principle, anodes based on tin dioxide can achieve much higher specific capacities, and therefore store more energy, than the carbon anodes currently being used. They have the ability to absorb more lithium ions," says Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "Pure tin oxide, however, exhibits very weak cycle stability—the storage capability of the batteries steadily decreases and they can only be recharged a few times. The volume of the anode changes with each charging and discharging cycle, which leads to it crumbling."

One way of addressing this problem is hybrid materials or nanocomposites—composite materials that contain nanoparticles. The scientists developed a material comprising tin oxide nanoparticles enriched with antimony, on a base layer of graphene. The graphene basis aids the structural stability and conductivity of the material. The tin oxide particles are less than three nanometres in size—in other words less than three millionths of a millimetre—and are directly "grown" on the graphene. The small size of the particle and its good contact with the graphene layer also improves its tolerance to volume changes—the lithium cell becomes more stable and lasts longer.

"Enriching the nanoparticles with antimony ensures the material is extremely conductive," explains Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "This makes the anode much quicker, meaning that it can store one-and-a-half times more energy in just one minute than would be possible with conventional graphite anodes. It can even store three times more energy for the usual charging time of one hour."

"Such high energy densities were only previously achieved with low charging rates," says Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "Faster charging cycles always led to a quick reduction in capacity." The antimony-doped anodes developed by the scientists, however, retain 77 % of their original capacity even after 1,000 cycles.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Saturday June 16 2018, @03:17PM (1 child)

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 16 2018, @03:17PM (#693969) Journal

    Is fluorine really environmentally benign?

    +1 ignorant ranting, How many times have you encountered "elemental fluorine" I wonder?

    I encountered it today, in fact, in a moronic TFS that spoke of "environmentally benign elements—iron and fluorine."

    So did you, and so did GP.

    The thing that GP and I both saw, that you missed, was that some idiot somewhere thinks that fluroine is an "environmentally benign element", which is an enormously dangerous thing to believe, much less to say out loud to others.

    Derek Lowe's excellent Things I Won't Work With [sciencemag.org] articles explain fluorine's benign friendliness in terms of past research efforts to combine it with oxygen and blow things up with it. A sample from that:

    elemental fluorine has commanded respect since well before anyone managed to isolate it, a process that took a good fifty years to work out in the 1800s. (The list of people who were blown up or poisoned while trying to do so is impressive). And that’s at room temperature. At seven hundred freaking degrees, fluorine starts to dissociate into monoatomic radicals, thereby losing its gentle and forgiving nature. But that’s how you get it to react with oxygen to make a product that’s worse in pretty much every way.

    Nonchemists can have trouble distinguishing things like fluorine ("death from all directions") and fluoride ("stable and safe"). I expect to find them on random Internet forums, but I don't expect to find them designing batteries, especially lithium-based batteries, which are thinly-disguised bombs anyway.

    I encourage the reader to have a look at the article above extolling the wonders of fluorine. Even if your primary interest area isn't elemental in nature, it's got lots of action.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 17 2018, @09:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 17 2018, @09:25AM (#694193)

    You will NEVER encounter elemental fluorine unless you work with radiation or high energy lasers. Fluorine does not exist in nature unreacted, you just won't encounter it. Even at the toxic level of OMG!! SCARY!!! cyanide. Cross it off the list.

    Now, about those (GUBMINT) fluoride concerns. Ready to share?