Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Saturday June 16 2018, @09:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the electrifying-news dept.

Two soylentils have submitted stories about improvements in lithium battery storage capacity. The first focuses on the cathode while the second features improvements in the anode.

Tripling the Energy Storage of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Submitted via IRC for BoyceMagooglyMonkey

A collaboration led by scientists at the University of Maryland (UMD), the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory, and the U.S. Army Research Lab have developed and studied a new cathode material that could triple the energy density of lithium-ion battery electrodes. Their research was published on June 13 in Nature Communications.

"Lithium-ion batteries consist of an anode and a cathode," said Xiulin Fan, a scientist at UMD and one of the lead authors of the paper. "Compared to the large capacity of the commercial graphite anodes used in lithium-ion batteries, the capacity of the cathodes is far more limited. Cathode materials are always the bottleneck for further improving the energy density of lithium-ion batteries."

Scientists at UMD synthesized a new cathode material, a modified and engineered form of iron trifluoride (FeF3), which is composed of cost-effective and environmentally benign elements—iron and fluorine. Researchers have been interested in using chemical compounds like FeF3 in lithium-ion batteries because they offer inherently higher capacities than traditional cathode materials.

Source: https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=112885

Turbocharge For Lithium Batteries

A team of material researchers from Juelich, Munich, and Prague has succeeded in producing a composite material that is particularly suited for electrodes in lithium batteries. The nanocomposite material might help to significantly increase the storage capacity and lifetime of batteries as well as their charging speed. The researchers have published their findings in the journal Advanced Functional Materials.

"In principle, anodes based on tin dioxide can achieve much higher specific capacities, and therefore store more energy, than the carbon anodes currently being used. They have the ability to absorb more lithium ions," says Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "Pure tin oxide, however, exhibits very weak cycle stability—the storage capability of the batteries steadily decreases and they can only be recharged a few times. The volume of the anode changes with each charging and discharging cycle, which leads to it crumbling."

One way of addressing this problem is hybrid materials or nanocomposites—composite materials that contain nanoparticles. The scientists developed a material comprising tin oxide nanoparticles enriched with antimony, on a base layer of graphene. The graphene basis aids the structural stability and conductivity of the material. The tin oxide particles are less than three nanometres in size—in other words less than three millionths of a millimetre—and are directly "grown" on the graphene. The small size of the particle and its good contact with the graphene layer also improves its tolerance to volume changes—the lithium cell becomes more stable and lasts longer.

"Enriching the nanoparticles with antimony ensures the material is extremely conductive," explains Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "This makes the anode much quicker, meaning that it can store one-and-a-half times more energy in just one minute than would be possible with conventional graphite anodes. It can even store three times more energy for the usual charging time of one hour."

"Such high energy densities were only previously achieved with low charging rates," says Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "Faster charging cycles always led to a quick reduction in capacity." The antimony-doped anodes developed by the scientists, however, retain 77 % of their original capacity even after 1,000 cycles.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Saturday June 16 2018, @10:49PM (5 children)

    by krishnoid (1156) on Saturday June 16 2018, @10:49PM (#694064)

    Wouldn't this mean that electric sedans/compacts would finally blow past the range of ICE-powered ones? This seems like the last checkbox when deciding on electric vs gas when buying your new car.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bzipitidoo on Saturday June 16 2018, @11:18PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Saturday June 16 2018, @11:18PM (#694069) Journal

    Yeah. An 8 hour recharge time would not be a problem if the range was above an all day long drive, say 1000 km.

    I've been anxiously watching for a decade now, trying to judge when it's sensible to make the jump to BEV. Right now, the ICE is still superior.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JustNiz on Sunday June 17 2018, @01:18AM (1 child)

    by JustNiz (1573) on Sunday June 17 2018, @01:18AM (#694092)

    I don't know about you but relative price, not being spied on, able to go offroad, and being able to service/repair/modify it yourself are all key parts of my car-buying decisions.
    Electric cars (especially Tesla) can't come even close on any of those.

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Sunday June 17 2018, @02:05AM

      by krishnoid (1156) on Sunday June 17 2018, @02:05AM (#694107)

      Good points, but which of those things wouldn't change quickly (except for the being spied upon) once manufacturing ramps up among multiple automakers?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 17 2018, @03:33AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 17 2018, @03:33AM (#694131)

    For several years I was making a 1000 mile (1600km) "commute" every few weeks -- keeping a long distance relationship going. Even if a battery car had 600 mile range (double a Tesla), a stop in the middle of that trip (at 500 miles) for several hours of charging would have made this a 2-day trip, with motel costs added on. As it was I filled up about 4 times (over 300 mi range on a tank) at less than 5 minutes each. Quickest trip was about 15 hours door-to-door, usually more like 16 or 17 with traffic and more stops to walk around and stretch.

    Charging car-sized batteries will always be tough to match the energy that flows through the nozzle when you fill up a car with gasoline -- it's 10s of megawatts flowing through that hose. I don't expect to see the day when car batteries are connected to a major power station for a couple of minutes for a quick charge. Even if the batteries would take the current, imagine the substation (and copper) required at the charging point!

    Oh, in case you are wondering, we now live in the same place. Even a short range electric would take care of most of my trips now.

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Monday June 18 2018, @12:07AM

      by krishnoid (1156) on Monday June 18 2018, @12:07AM (#694379)

      So I suppose the charger now serves dual-duty to keep both the SO and the car topped up? How convenient! :-)