Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday June 16 2018, @09:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the electrifying-news dept.

Two soylentils have submitted stories about improvements in lithium battery storage capacity. The first focuses on the cathode while the second features improvements in the anode.

Tripling the Energy Storage of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Submitted via IRC for BoyceMagooglyMonkey

A collaboration led by scientists at the University of Maryland (UMD), the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory, and the U.S. Army Research Lab have developed and studied a new cathode material that could triple the energy density of lithium-ion battery electrodes. Their research was published on June 13 in Nature Communications.

"Lithium-ion batteries consist of an anode and a cathode," said Xiulin Fan, a scientist at UMD and one of the lead authors of the paper. "Compared to the large capacity of the commercial graphite anodes used in lithium-ion batteries, the capacity of the cathodes is far more limited. Cathode materials are always the bottleneck for further improving the energy density of lithium-ion batteries."

Scientists at UMD synthesized a new cathode material, a modified and engineered form of iron trifluoride (FeF3), which is composed of cost-effective and environmentally benign elements—iron and fluorine. Researchers have been interested in using chemical compounds like FeF3 in lithium-ion batteries because they offer inherently higher capacities than traditional cathode materials.

Source: https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=112885

Turbocharge For Lithium Batteries

A team of material researchers from Juelich, Munich, and Prague has succeeded in producing a composite material that is particularly suited for electrodes in lithium batteries. The nanocomposite material might help to significantly increase the storage capacity and lifetime of batteries as well as their charging speed. The researchers have published their findings in the journal Advanced Functional Materials.

"In principle, anodes based on tin dioxide can achieve much higher specific capacities, and therefore store more energy, than the carbon anodes currently being used. They have the ability to absorb more lithium ions," says Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "Pure tin oxide, however, exhibits very weak cycle stability—the storage capability of the batteries steadily decreases and they can only be recharged a few times. The volume of the anode changes with each charging and discharging cycle, which leads to it crumbling."

One way of addressing this problem is hybrid materials or nanocomposites—composite materials that contain nanoparticles. The scientists developed a material comprising tin oxide nanoparticles enriched with antimony, on a base layer of graphene. The graphene basis aids the structural stability and conductivity of the material. The tin oxide particles are less than three nanometres in size—in other words less than three millionths of a millimetre—and are directly "grown" on the graphene. The small size of the particle and its good contact with the graphene layer also improves its tolerance to volume changes—the lithium cell becomes more stable and lasts longer.

"Enriching the nanoparticles with antimony ensures the material is extremely conductive," explains Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "This makes the anode much quicker, meaning that it can store one-and-a-half times more energy in just one minute than would be possible with conventional graphite anodes. It can even store three times more energy for the usual charging time of one hour."

"Such high energy densities were only previously achieved with low charging rates," says Fattakhova-Rohlfing. "Faster charging cycles always led to a quick reduction in capacity." The antimony-doped anodes developed by the scientists, however, retain 77 % of their original capacity even after 1,000 cycles.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Saturday June 16 2018, @11:12PM (1 child)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Saturday June 16 2018, @11:12PM (#694067) Journal

    Yep, if this was coming to market soon, it'd be time, maybe past time, to trade in the old gas guzzler and get a battery electric vehicle.

    > yet another battery paper

    There are so many now that even if 99% of the ideas are impractical for one reason or another (expensive materials, too heavy and/or bulky, extremely high manufacturing costs, can't scale up, short life, long charge times, dangerously destabilizes the battery) that 1% that pans out is likely to be the final push that leads to battery electric vehicles going mainstream and relegating the internal combustion engine to museums and the scrap heap. We're real close. If not the Tesla model 3, there are others waiting in the wings.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by ledow on Tuesday June 19 2018, @09:17AM

    by ledow (5567) on Tuesday June 19 2018, @09:17AM (#694889) Homepage

    99% or more of them are, and yet batteries haven't moved on.

    Battery technology is one prime example of just this kind of "PhD thesis" work... hey, look, in a lab, we get 0.1% more out of it! The fact that it was super-cooled, in a vacuum, stops working after 10 seconds, catches on fire, yeah, that doesn't matter. We can say "I can see this technology quadrupling battery capacity!" and get some press and pass my viva.

    Literally, you have to go by the chemistry and the capacity, because nothing else really changes. There was a reason that early Tesla's etc. used laptop battery packs and now use standardised lithium modules en-masse. Because there's nothing significantly better available and they're just hoping they can scale the production.

    Alkaline, Lead-acid, NiCd, NiMH, Li-ion, Li-Po.

    That's it.

    And every laptop for the last twenty years has used Li-ion (usually using those same standard cells!). And Li-Po has problems and is used only where space / weight is REALLY tight (e.g. drones and things).

    As I stated (here and elsewhere) - an AA format battery from over 10 years ago is still better than anything you can buy on Amazon today in that format. Batteries really haven't come on in over a decade at least. And the last fifty years of "breakthrough" technology in listed just about. One per decade, or thereabouts, and diminishing returns. The biggest leap was probably NiMH to Li-ion and that happened 20+ years ago (on paper, slightly later for the market).

    The vast, vast, vast majority of these things never come to fruition. Never. They don't function outside of the lab or extremely niche and specialist purposes. They certainly don't make viable commercial products, which means they never even make it into space (i.e. huge budgets for specialist materials) yet alone cars, or your local supermarket.

    Battery papers are the worst. Slashdot and (at times) Soylent has posted several every year for the last 20+ years, to my knowledge. Not one of them was about actual technologies / changes as drastic as they claimed (tiny incremental improvements, maybe, but nothing ground-breaking, and no I don't even remember stories about Li-ion, or Li-Po!). And yet Tesla still use and make standard 18650 cells - and the capacity of them is no different to anyone else's.