Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday June 18 2018, @08:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the take-my-kingdom dept.

The Australian Government believes that it needs a golden key to backdoor encryption within Australia via legislation. The Brits and the Yanks have both already had a nudge at this and both have conceded that requiring a backdoor to encryption is not viable but this will not stop the Australian Liberal Party from trying.

Digital rights experts have described the proposal as "ludicrous" as Cyber security minister Angus Taylor stating that the legislation would be presented for public comment within the next quarter. While the Australian Government has not detailed how it expects to gain access to encrypted data, companies may be penalized if they don't kowtow to the new laws. There is nothing to be discussed here that hasn't been said before other than the Australian Government sincerely believes it can force companies to divulge encrypted data to authorities on demand.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 18 2018, @04:16PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 18 2018, @04:16PM (#694564)

    it's a shame to see an otherwise intelligent person, who can make things, use a slave platform and make slaveware for it. lazy name too. "i" (well that was original) "toolbox" well that's awfully generic. so the name means "mac doucheware does something". what a waste.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Tuesday June 19 2018, @12:36AM (1 child)

    by fyngyrz (6567) on Tuesday June 19 2018, @12:36AM (#694769) Journal

    a) I'm writing it in a very portable manner (using Qt / c++) and intend to port it, presuming that the task ends up being reasonable, which is the plan, anyway. I've successfully ported large (much larger, in fact) Qt applications before, so the odds are decent.

    b) I'm open to suggestions for the name. Image Toolbox was too long. Hence the iToolBox, but yeah, i-this and i-that.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 19 2018, @01:19PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 19 2018, @01:19PM (#694966)

      There's already iToolbox for MATLAB.