Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday June 20 2018, @09:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the tiny-homes-for-proteins dept.

Scientists have obtained a slew of key information about proteins, the molecular workhorses of all cells, from single human cells for the first time.

The stockpile of information about proteins -- the most such data ever collected from a single mammalian cell -- gives scientists one of their clearest looks yet at the molecular happenings inside a human cell. Such data can reveal whether a cell is a rogue cancer cell, a malfunctioning pancreatic cell involved in diabetes, or a molecular player important for a preemie's survival.

These events and many more are determined by the actions of proteins in cells. Until now, detailed information on proteins inside single cells was hard to come by. The raw "data" -- the amount of each protein -- in a cell is extraordinarily scant and hard to measure. That's largely because scientists can't amplify proteins the way they can genes or other molecular messengers.

Now, in a study published in Angewandte Chemie, scientists from the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, working with counterparts at the University of Rochester Medical Center, show how they were able to learn an unprecedented amount of information about the proteins within samples of single human lung cells.

The scientists analyzed single cells, first from cultured cells and then from the lungs of a human donor, and detected on average more than 650 proteins in each cell -- many times more than conventional techniques capture from single cells.

[...] In the current study, the team analyzed the proteins in a sample of fluid that is less than one-ten-thousandth of a teaspoon. Within that sample, the proteins amounted to just .15 nanograms -- more than ten million times smaller than the weight of a typical mosquito.

Once scientists have their hands on such a valuable commodity -- the innards of a single human cell -- they put it through a battery of processing steps to prepare for analysis. But working with such a tiny sample has posed significant roadblocks to single-cell analysis. As the material is transferred from one test tube to another, from machine to machine, some of the sample is lost at every stage. When the original sample amounts to no more than a microscopic droplet, losing even a tiny bit of the sample is catastrophic.

Zhu and Kelly developed nanoPOTS, which stands for nanodroplet Processing in One pot for Trace Samples, to address this problem of sample loss. The technology is an automated platform for capturing, shunting, testing and measuring tiny amounts of fluid. Keys to the technology include a robot that dispenses the fluid to a location with an accuracy of one millionth of a meter, moving between tiny wells that minimize the amount of surface area onto which proteins might glom.

Within those tiny wells, scientists run several steps to isolate the proteins from the rest of the sample. Then, the material is fed into a mass spectrometer which separates out and measures each of hundreds of proteins.

Ying Zhu, Geremy Clair, William B. Chrisler, Yufeng Shen, Rui Zhao, Anil K. Shukla, Ronald J. Moore, Ravi S. Misra, Gloria S. Pryhuber, Richard D. Smith, Charles Ansong, Ryan T. Kelly. Proteomic Analysis of Single Mammalian Cells Enabled by Microfluidic Nanodroplet Sample Preparation and Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS. Angewandte Chemie, 2018; DOI: 10.1002/ange.201802843


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @11:56AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @11:56AM (#695545)

    It's neat to see research results like this from a National Lab -- all that money is going to something constructive (instead of destructive, which I think was the original goal of many of the national labs).

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @01:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @01:33PM (#695572)

    the politics of the national labs, however, is ferocious.

    Like all government funding, senators want the most for their backers , no matter how stupid an idea....