SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
US leaving UN Human Rights Council -- 'a cesspool of political bias'
US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley announced the United States is withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council Tuesday, accusing the body of bias against US ally Israel and a failure to hold human rights abusers accountable. The move, which the Trump administration has threatened for months, came down one day after the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights slammed the separation of children from their parents at the US-Mexico border as "unconscionable."
Speaking from the State Department, where she was joined by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Haley defended the move to withdraw from the council, saying US calls for reform were not heeded. "Human rights abusers continue to serve on, and be elected to, the council," said Haley, listing US grievances with the body. "The world's most inhumane regimes continue to escape its scrutiny, and the council continues politicizing scapegoating of countries with positive human rights records in an attempt to distract from the abusers in its ranks."
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @07:17PM (64 children)
The US is enforcing its laws. US citizens entering at a non-lawful point of entry would be arrested too!
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Snow on Wednesday June 20 2018, @07:43PM (43 children)
The US created those laws. That is no excuse.
It's absolutely despicable. All of America should be ashamed. American 'Christians' that bindly look the other way when it's inconvienient to accept reality are terrible people. I hope there is a hell so they can rot in it.
America used to be a moral leader. The entire world would look to America for guidance. In a year and a half, one child has changed all that. The people of America need to look deep and figure out what type of country they want to be a part of. The current path is bleak.
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @07:54PM (16 children)
Liberal society depends on the rule of law, it is the job of border agents to enforce that law. The only change here is that border agents were told to do their jobs.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Snow on Wednesday June 20 2018, @07:57PM (9 children)
I don't blame the border agents. I actually feel sorry for them too.
I place the blame squarely on Trump and his administration as well as the spineless scumbags you call Congress.
(Score: 1, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:12PM
For telling immigration officials to do their jobs? Trump didn't create any of the rules being applied.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:12PM (2 children)
Actually, I do blame them. Nuremberg taught us that "I was only following orders" is no excuse. If they had any conscience, they should feel very ashamed of this. Very ashamed.
Yes, well, that too. And the people who voted for these assholes.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @04:48AM (1 child)
Dubya, Obama, the CIA and what they did at Gitmo and other black sites taught us that the lessons of Nuremberg no longer apply. "I was only following orders" got all kinds of monsters off the hook.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:43PM
All of the above must hang for that. They must hang.
Monsters must be slain, no matter where they are.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by frojack on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:16PM (3 children)
No blame for Mexico, sending and financing these rush-to-the-border marches?
https://www.fairus.org/issue/illegal-immigration/mexicos-defense-illegal-immigrants [fairus.org]
You seem to be under the delusion that all at once, a bunch of people suddenly decide to march their children 1000 miles with not a peso in their pocket the entire length of Mexico to reach the US.
Son: Your naivete shows no bounds. It doesn't happen that way. This is planned, orchestrated, organized, funded. And its not "coyotes" either. Its the Mexican Government and liberals in the US attempting to fill the voter polls.
Give these parents a choice: Take your children and go back to Mexico today, free transportation. Or sit in jail with your kids in another jail. What decision do you think they would make? They'd choose to stay. Most of these kids are NOT traveling with their parents. No parent would do that knowingly. They were duped.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 5, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:36PM
God DAMN you're nuts.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @11:03PM (1 child)
Guía del Migrante Mexicano translated to English [theamericanresistance.com].
I fail to see much there that is nefarious.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @12:29AM
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Mykl on Thursday June 21 2018, @01:39AM
The Director's Edition Box Set of Lord of the Rings (Fellowship I think) includes an amazing number of 'making of' features etc, as well as a documentary about Tolkien.
One of the fascinating things I found there was that Tolkien came up with the idea of a Wraith from his experiences of WW1. To summarise, he felt that the only way in which such horrific battles were able to occur, leading to the deaths of millions of soldiers, was the separation between military command (who were looking at bunch of pins on a board hundreds of miles away) and the soldiers in the trenches. Military Command was able to remove the human element from their thought and could treat the war as a series of tactical manoeuvres, similar to a board game. In doing so, they could send thousands of men to their doom and still sleep easy that night. This absence of compassion led him to think of a general with no soul who existed purely to obey their commander - eventually leading to the idea of the RingWraith.
Trump is no Sauron, but Congress are definitely looking like RingWraiths.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:26PM (5 children)
We can control our border without breaking up families with no plan for reuniting them.
We can control our border without becoming the kind of governments we were fighting in the previous century.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:30PM (4 children)
Sure and Trump, who was not responsible for existing legislation, has just signed an executive order to that effect.
(Score: 2) by digitalaudiorock on Wednesday June 20 2018, @10:55PM (3 children)
We'll see how that goes, given that he also said he plans to continue his zero tolerance policy. That's a bit of a 1=2 if you ask me.
You simply can't put parents in jail without separating them from their parents. Granted that's a dilemma...one that could be used as arguments for either side I suppose. Most of us want to err on the side of not traumatizing children.
However, what's NOT a dilemma is that fact that when you deport someone, you most certainly can reunite them with thier children first. There are growing reports where this is NOT happening...where parents are being deported with their kids still here! What's the fucking excuse for that? I suppose if this legislation stops that it's an improvement but that's a pretty low fucking bar.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @11:47PM (2 children)
Trump was clear there will be legislation. He set a six month deadline for congress back in Sept 2017 [newyorker.com] in an attempt to get a bi-partisan bill. That didn't happen [washingtontimes.com] so he repealed DACA (Obama executive order) and enforced existing laws. Now Trump has signed an executive order to address the issue of children being separated, the pressure is once again on the Democrats and once again Schumer is playing politics. The thing is; Dragging your feet and pointing at that mean man over there isn't good politics.
Trump is a bully, no doubt about it but he's also proving effective and that's the biggest fear of his critics. Trump passing the DREAM Act that's been bouncing around since 2001 isn't a success the Democrats want this administration to have, especially because it runs counter to their narrative. Me, I'd insist on comprehensive border egress checks too. [thehill.com]
(Score: 2) by digitalaudiorock on Thursday June 21 2018, @12:41AM (1 child)
Because none of that had anything to do with his insistence on building that fucking bat shit insane border wall right? Kudos to anyone who refuses to accept that. You'd have to be insane to do otherwise.
(Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Thursday June 21 2018, @03:16AM
We're building the Border Wall. As everybody knows. And believe me, it will have that big beautiful door. With a lot of people going out. And a few coming in. Congress MUST FULLY FUND the Wall. And Mexico, eventually, will pay. Trust me, Mexico will pay 100%. We also need much better immigration laws. Our very foolish Visa Lottery randomly hands out green cards without any regard for skill, merit, or the safety of American people. As the Democrats do nothing but resist, blame, complain and obstruct!!!!
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:03PM (3 children)
Fine, the US should just repeal all of their immigration laws. It's a democracy, vote. And let everyone just walk in freely, bringing crime, taking US jobs, not paying taxes, damaging the economy, and so on.
Oh, wait, people in the US want to protect their own economy and protect their own children? Who would have thought?
(Score: 5, Touché) by Gaaark on Thursday June 21 2018, @01:54AM (2 children)
Wait!
People in the US want to protect their own children by putting them in cages or by putting other children in cages?
I'm confused.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @09:56AM (1 child)
That's the bit I modded you informative for.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday June 21 2018, @10:53PM
So enlighten me
Whose kids do you want caged?
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:23PM (6 children)
There is. They will.
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:35PM (5 children)
There is no Heaven or Hell. Hell would be an improvement.
Also Trump a good Presbyterian boy who dindu nuffin. I read it on his Wiki.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @10:24PM (3 children)
I've known Presbyterians all my life. I was raised in the Presbyterian Church. My father was ordained PCUSA. I know Presbyterians and I can assure you Donald J Trump is not like any Presbyterian I have ever known.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday June 21 2018, @01:57AM (2 children)
I was raised going to a Presbyterian church.
I have turned against organized religion because I saw Trumps in every pew.
There are Trumps in EVERY religion.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:57PM (1 child)
I'm a Presbyterian, and have been all my life. I don't see anything Presbyterian in Donald Trump's behavior. He's not understated, like Presbyterians are. He's immodest. He's a loud mouth. He's a jerk. None of those are qualities or values that Presbyterianism encourages. Presbyterianism has a Calvinist lineage, so DJT pretty much represents the opposite of all of that in his comportment.
But, then, I don't think these are days that call for understated or muted. They call for cut the crap. Previous administrations abused the stuffing out of immigrants, and pretended they didn't. Previous administrations did nothing to insist our neighbors do their part to take in refugees, seeing in them instead a source of cheap labor to undermine American workers of all levels; meanwhile they performed a pious song and dance about "give me your tired, your hungry, your poor," to hide the fact that those poor bastards were imprisoned in slave labor camps in the orange groves of Florida and the back 40 of the huge factory farms of California's Central Valley (see the National Geographic issue on modern slavery).
So of course all the forces in the power elite who have been milking that slave labor system for decades are going to throw everything they can at Trump or anyone who tries to put a stop to it. Of course they're going to accuse him of all the things they have been doing in the dark for all that time.
I don't like Donald Trump. I would not like to sit down and have a beer with him. He's a pompous ass with horrible taste in everything. But I don't need him to be likeable. I need him to be a molotov cocktail to burn down the bullshit artists and hypocrites who have destroyed American democracy.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday June 21 2018, @11:06PM
I guess, unfortunately, my Presbyterians are worse than yours: everyone would be all holy holy, love your fellow man in church but be all honking the horn when the parking lot didn't empty out fast enough.
I went to a retreat with a friend of mine who was Reorganized church of Jesus Christ of latter-day saints.
Everyone there was all holy holy, love your fellow man until after supper. Then, jobs were chosen.
Everyone loved doing dishes because they sang and tossed the dishes to each other to wash, dry, put away....lots of fun.
Then the minister asked for volunteers to clean the bathrooms and toilets. No volunteers.
Not. One. Single. Volunteer.
So I stuck my hand up: I'd eaten their food and I was ready to pay back by working.
The minister looked at me, saw I was 'the visitor/guest' and looked away, continuing to ask for volunteers.
FINALLY some people got guilted into doing it.
THAT was one of those moments when I decided organized religion was bunk.
"Yeah, I'll volunteer for fun stuff, sure God! Oh.....toilets.....ewwwwww, no thanks, God."
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday June 21 2018, @05:41PM
Maybe this planet is some other planet's hell?
The lower I set my standards the more accomplishments I have.
(Score: 2) by jimtheowl on Wednesday June 20 2018, @11:21PM (4 children)
There is a lawful process to deal with how asylum seekers are to be treated, and that law that is being broken by enforcing the current policy.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @12:02AM (3 children)
Actually, you're wrong [cornell.edu]
There is a lawful process for claiming asylum [alllaw.com] and it doesn't involve crossing borders illegally. So you're wrong there as well.
(Score: 3, Informative) by jimtheowl on Thursday June 21 2018, @12:08PM (2 children)
From your own link, they could simply give them a $50 fine.
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
(b) Improper time or place; civil penaltiesAny alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of—
(1) at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or
(2) twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.
Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.
-----
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 22 2018, @12:08AM (1 child)
Not if they claim asylum which is the issue here. So yes, you're wrong.
(Score: 2) by jimtheowl on Friday June 22 2018, @08:27PM
(Score: 3, Interesting) by unauthorized on Thursday June 21 2018, @12:22AM (2 children)
No country should be ashamed for enforcing it's borders.
If anything, I'd like for the west to stop braindraining the third world by taking all the best and brightest away from them, immigration to the west is destroying my country and many others.
With it's history of waging a war on the third world, I wouldn't call America a "moral leader".
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @12:47AM
I've spent the last 5 years trying to explain this to people. Countries that cannot sustain a middle class are socially and politically unstable.
The left wing in the West was protesting globalisation and promoting localisation just a decade ago. Since then they've grabbed onto the coat-tails of neoliberalism and jumped off the metaphorical cliff edge by labelling any reasoned arguments as "racist" or "sexist". So while you may think you're making an appeal to reason, you're really just "a fascist with internalised racism". These people simply cannot be reasoned with.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday June 21 2018, @03:05PM
If you're one of those best and brightest from those countries, trying to escape to the West is a perfectly rational move when the mega-corporations are actively undermining democracy where you are by corrupting and destroying your own reformers. Shit, the Iranians elected Mossadegh who wanted to use Iranian oil money to improve their country, and the CIA assassinated him because the oil companies were going to lose their access to that oil. That was not an isolated occurrence. It is policy. It is the everyday.
The American government, and other governments in the West, run around making everyone believe that Al Qaeda are the threat to freedom and democracy. When that gets old they invent another external bogeyman to distract everyone. The fact is, they are the criminals. They are the gangs. They are the existential threat to freedom and democracy. They do it every day, and get the sheeple to applaud them for it.
They are that way because we have a system that screens for psychopaths and puts them in power. We have to depose them, and weed them all out. We need to exile them to a desert isle to live out the Lord of the Flies fantasy they want to visit on the rest of us all the time.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by AthanasiusKircher on Thursday June 21 2018, @01:27AM (4 children)
When?? Seriously. I'm nowhere near a Trump supporter, but pretending the U.S. used to be a "moral leader" that other countries should look to... that's a combination of hubris, hypocrisy, and serious denial.
Let's look at American history a bit. When, precisely, was America a "moral leader"? For the first ~80 years, we were happy to enslave an entire race to prop up our economy. And, despite the modern rhetoric about the Civil War, even the great Abraham Lincoln was more than willing to endorse the Corwin Amendment to make slavery perpetual in the South if it would save the Union. All this at a time when the trend among "civilized" nations in Europe was to abolish slavery.
Meanwhile, and then for many decades afterward, we have the large-scale genocide against Native Americans. In the late 1800s, America began to participate in the same BS imperialist stuff that European nations had been for a long time. I'll skip over the nonsense involved in adventures like the Spanish-American War, but let's look at WWI and WWII, both of which saw the U.S. strongly favoring sitting on the sidelines while badness was taking over the rest of what was considered the "civilized" world at the time.
Not really the character of a "moral leader," but then again, nobody really gave much of a crap about American policy in the rest of the world before WWII. (And we won't even get into the badness of WWII -- firebombing civilians, etc. You might make a case for nuclear weapons in Japan given the whole situation, but firebombing in Germany and Japan was... well, war crimes. Except we won, so nobody was executed for them.)
And then what happened after WWII? Because of the luck of its priority in having nuclear weapons, the U.S. strongly fueled an arms race with the USSR for a number of decades that could have destroyed humanity. Meanwhile, it participated in many other minor wars (both called "wars" and random interference in other nations) in a lot of ways that were questionably moral, to say the least. But hey -- it's a "superpower," so it gets to do what it wants.
And both parties have hardly provided strong "moral" leadership to the world for the past few decades. You have the insane weapons escalations under Reagan (and playing around in foreign dictatorships), Clinton's questionable missile strikes [wikipedia.org] which occurred suspiciously close to a scandal in Wag the Dog style (and ultimately were a huge propaganda victory for Osama bin Laden that likely fueled future actions against the U.S., like 9/11), Bush II's launching of a war on false pretenses (WMDs? what WMDs?) and attempted rejustification of torture within the civilized world, Obama's drone strikes against civilians (and even against American citizens, legalizing [vox.com] the assassination of American citizens by the federal government without trial)... etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.
America was NEVER a moral leader. It was always incredibly hypocritical, and other nations "look[ed] to America for guidance" because we had more missiles. America was a superpower. What choice did other nations have?
But for a long time -- and still to a large extent today -- most Americans happily ignore most of what goes on in the rest of the world, including the official actions of the U.S. government for the past few generations.
Oh sure, Trump's worse. But Trump is merely the honest manifestation of some of the constant character traits America has shown throughout its history.
Honestly, from Trump's approval ratings, it's clear that a little less than half of America is pretty well represented by him. That's profoundly disturbing, but when you look back on the history of badness in the U.S. (and in the U.S. actions around the world), it's pretty clear that's not an aberration. It's just HONESTY for once. For a long time, Americans lived ignorance (between "state secrets" and just willful blindness to the rest of the world) of the crap the U.S. leaders were doing around the world, then they started living in denial, but more strongly when their "party guy" was in power.
Indeed. That I absolutely agree with. Hopefully, Trump might serve as a wake-up call, but one thing that would be helpful is to realize that (1) Trump clearly represents the desires and wishes of a significant number of Americans -- however much I and many others find that confusing -- and (2) the legacy of imperialism he's participating in is actually the NORM of American history, not an aberration.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:01AM (1 child)
And that is all before the era of America's Banana Republics.
America likes to talk big about its moral core, but when you look at its words and its actions they rarely coincide. Living by a code of conduct or moral fiber is for the plebs, not for the leadership class.
For another excellent example, go read what lead to the Spanish-American War, or the Mexican American War.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday June 21 2018, @03:16PM
God bless you guys for saying it. I am so frustrated with those who are claiming that this is all Trump's fault. That he's an aberration. That everybody before was all sweetness and light, and if we can only somehow get rid of Trump, then everything will be sweetness and light again.
America is not the moral paragon people imagine it to be, and it never has been. But for the first time in my lifetime, somebody is being honest about it. That is so refreshing in a political universe of infinite hypocrisy and endless bullshit.
America should be a moral paragon. It should be an avatar of justice and freedom, because that's what I teach my kids, what I expect from my neighbors, and what I demand from myself. But we will never realize that as a country until we first cut the crap and stop pretending like anybody in DC has the faintest interest in any of that. In fact, everyone in DC constitutes an existential threat to all of those values, and do everything they can every day to undermine the yearning in the hearts of average Americans to realize those values.
The people in DC are those kids who cheated off your test in the 2nd grade, who cut in line after you had been waiting for hours, who steal the bread from the kid who hasn't eaten in three days, who trip the kid with the thick glasses who's good in math because they think it would be funny. They are the absolute dregs of humanity.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:04AM
And Snowden was one of those bright moral American lights!!!......and he's now a hunted man. Hunted because he spot-lighted the US IMMORALITY.
Notice how there are no Snowdens in the US leadership.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @04:12AM
No the US has never been perfect, but the country handled post WW2 better than Europe handled post WW1.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:38AM
Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. Render unto Uncle Sam that which is Uncle's.
Christians don't write the laws in the US, and you don't want them to do so.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @04:37AM
Slightly offtopic, but America was never a moral leader. There was a lot of propaganda about it when the times were good after WW2 when every other country in the world was a shithole and people wanted to buy and get back on the track as soon as possible, but it wasn't true ever. Europeans, esp. western europeans knew it, asians knew it, africans knew it and south americans knew it. Only that europeans tolerated it for some reason (won't speak it).
Trump is a loud mouthed but relatively straight forward person, and all the wool is coming off the eyes of people who are now either extremely angry or were already extremely angry.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by bob_super on Wednesday June 20 2018, @07:49PM (11 children)
The Great Deporter In Chief Obama set new records for kicking illegals out, without getting all our Friends -and the Pope- to scream about his methods.
(Score: 1) by tftp on Wednesday June 20 2018, @07:58PM
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @08:01PM (8 children)
Blame the media. This is one of the reasons we need to bust up the media monopolies, important matters go unnoticed when the oligarchy desires it. Without the media making a stink about something it is near impossible to rally the people.
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday June 20 2018, @09:02PM (1 child)
Yup. As soon as the media is finally silenced, we can have our fun with all those undesirables.
I hear the weather is lovely in Dachau this time of the year.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @11:59PM
That's not what GP said.
wswswswsws, for example, frequently points out where the mainstream media has covered up important issues. GP's hypothesis that we see big media move in lock-step due to monopolization is a good point. Whether it's correct or not is beyond the scope of this post.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:12AM (5 children)
Yup
The first thing you do when you want to take control of a country is control the media/communications.
Then you change the government to what you want.
Then you do what you want to the populace.
Coup d'etat.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2, Disagree) by Runaway1956 on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:51AM (4 children)
Yes, of course. And, America's progressives do control the US media. Thank you for pointing that out.
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @04:35AM (3 children)
It always amazes me that in the face of media ownership consolidation to a very few mega corps, that anyone can somehow see that as progressive control.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday June 21 2018, @02:41PM (2 children)
Go back several months, to the last presidential election. See the reactions of the various hosts, anchors, and talking heads on the mainstream media. With the exception of Faux Noise, there was much weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth. Seriously, some of those queer fucks were CRYING on camera, because their "progressive" candidate lost the election.
And, you guys are much worse than Republicans. This time, Obama time, only a few birthers were left to carry the torch against Obama. This time, Trump time, we still have nearly half the country suffering from butt-hurt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUGB0zUlUxo [youtube.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @06:43PM (1 child)
Sounds like Obama's time to me, although I must say the racism and hatred toward Obama was a lot worse and unjustified than the hatred towards Trump.
Kiwis and Oranges here... sounds like you are still in denial about that big dildo Trump shoved up your butt and you're projecting out all your "butthurt" feelings. Trump is terrible, being angry about it is normal. Being angry that people don't like Trump means you're a moron with deeper issues.
(Score: 1, Offtopic) by Runaway1956 on Friday June 22 2018, @01:18AM
Every prejudiced bigot can justify his own hatred. Thanks for confirming that.
(Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Thursday June 21 2018, @05:07AM
You misunderstand the root of evil in the world today. Democrats who do the exact same things as Republicans, are Jesuses, but Republican who do the exact same things as Democrats are Satans.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @09:36PM (4 children)
Nazi Germany also enforced its laws.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @10:00PM (3 children)
It took a super-state[*] to overcome them and declare their laws unjust. Who is going to overcome the USA to judge its laws?
[*] A coalition of several countries.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 20 2018, @10:49PM (2 children)
Teach your kids mandarin.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday June 21 2018, @05:01PM (1 child)
Hahahaha good luck getting justice out of the Chinese Communist Party.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @05:45PM
I don't think you'd get justice from the CCP, but maybe you'd get survival.
That's also worth something, for the time being. CCP is not a death cult (yet?).
Once the Nazis had finished off all the undesirables, they'd be forced to invent new undesirables, or risk instability.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @06:14AM
Why?...I mean really why? Why should anyone be detained traveling anywhere on this rock???
(Score: 2) by fritsd on Thursday June 21 2018, @05:38PM
Right.
I'll go from 0 to Godwin in a few seconds:
In the Third Reich, it was illegal to be both a Jew and alive at the same time.
Any comment on that?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 21 2018, @09:44PM
Arrested for what? Not having their exit-visa properly cancelled by returning through an official point of entry? The US does not have exit visas, so how would they know you left? How would they know you were entering, and if you are a citizen, it can be illegal to enter your own country? What are you? Papieren, Bitte! Nazis.