Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday June 21 2018, @05:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the pony-up-for-your-misdeeds dept.

The time has come for Apple to pay for the infamous Error 53 that bricked iPhones and iPads taken to a third party for repairs.

The Federal Court of Australia announced Monday its order for Apple to pay AU$9 million (around US $6.8 million converted) for telling customers who encountered the error they weren't entitled to a refund.

The error was first reported in 2016. If you fixed a cracked screen or a failing Touch ID-enabled home button through a third party not licensed by Apple, "security checks" would render your iPhone or iPad unusable, showing only the message "Error 53".

Apple explained the message as a security measure to protect the iPhone's fingerprint sensor from exploitation. It released an iOS 9.2.1 update later that February to restore bricked devices, but reports showed it did not re-enable Touch ID and customers complained they still lost photos, documents and apps.

In April 2017, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced a legal battle with Apple in the Federal Court of Australia. It said Apple violated customers' rights under Australian Consumer Law to repairs for devices bricked by Error 53.

Then, in June 2017, the ACCC conducted an undercover operation involving 13 calls with Apple retailers in Australia, in which Apple representatives allegedly said Apple did not have responsibility to remedy faulty iPhones repaired by an unauthorised third party.

Apple has since admitted that from February 2015 to February 2016, its US website and Apple staff in Australian stores and on customer service phone calls said to 275 Australian customers affected by Error 53 it wasn't responsible for a remedy.

But according to Australian Consumer Law, that's not on.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by arslan on Thursday June 21 2018, @07:25AM (1 child)

    by arslan (3462) on Thursday June 21 2018, @07:25AM (#696076)

    That is not mutually exclusive to consumer protection laws - as shown, consumer rights trumps that when there is conflict. Some sanity, in the insanity of DRM. A good day for Oz consumers.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by evilcam on Friday June 22 2018, @02:31AM

    by evilcam (3239) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 22 2018, @02:31AM (#696546)

    +1

    Australian consumer law, whilst not perfect, is a damn sight better than other parts of the world.

    "No Refunds" is all but illegal here, and that's a good thing.