Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Saturday June 23 2018, @05:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the systemd dept.

If you've been trying to keep Microsoft's forced updates and upgrades off your machine, your job just got harder. With KB 4056254, we now have a new Win10 Update Facilitation Service joining its comrade-in-arms Update Assistant V2 to ensure no patch gets blocked.

You can look at the new KB 4056254 Win10 Update Facilitation Service and the re-emergence of Win10 Update Assistant V2 from two different perspectives. On the one hand, you have those poor hapless Win10 users who accidentally munged Windows Update. On the other hand, you have folks with bazookas and flamethrowers who want to keep some semblance of control over updating their machines.

Both groups now face two different Microsoft initiatives to reset Windows Update.

[...] Seems, from April to June 2018, some savvy Win 10 users have found new ways to disable or block Windows Update. So, M$ has to come out with KB4056254 to "neutralize" their efforts. It's like a cat-and-mouse game.

Which seems to me like the core of the matter. It's not nice to mess with Mother Microsoft's patching schemes, so you're going to get a few new services running in the background to whop your system upside the head if you dare to block patches.

Sources:
Win10 Update Facilitation Service joins Update Assistant V2 to make sure you get patched | Computerworld
Watch out: Win10 Update Facilitation as a Service and a new push for the Update Assistant | AskWoody


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 24 2018, @06:55AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 24 2018, @06:55AM (#697476)

    "lacks breadth of modern and mature software". Really?
    I suppose you have to use some autocad-like thingy that's only availabe on windows.
    Here's an idea: when you go to conferences, and meet your peers, talk to them. Find out what you guys can do to move away from Windows. It's very likely there are others who want to get rid of windows, and if there are enough of you, you can just talk to the programmers of your "mature software", and tell them you want linux/MacOS whatever.
    I would recommend not moving to a Mac, but it's still much better than Windows.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Immerman on Sunday June 24 2018, @09:35AM (3 children)

    by Immerman (3985) on Sunday June 24 2018, @09:35AM (#697490)

    Yes really. take any popular piece of software - you know, the software you need to actually be fully compatible when exchanging data with someone else, and we both know the odds of there being a native Linux version are slim. Libre Office is wonderful, and I use it for my own work - but the moment I need to collaborate with someone else - it's got to be MS Office - 90% compatibility just doesn't cut it when you're trying to get work done. And yeah,that one is totally the fault of MS and their intentional file format sabotage, but that doesn't let me get away from it (though I always savor the moments when I get to rescue old MS Office files using LO, since age or corruption has made them incompatible with MS Office's fragile file loader.

    And hey, I *do* tell software publishers I'd like a Linux version - but honestly, how many thousands, maybe millions of people have told Adobe they'd like native versions of Illustrator, Photoshop, etc (yes, GIMP and Inkscape are wonderful programs, I love them, but they just don't stack up in a professional setting) They don't care. Linux desktop users are a drop in the bucket, not even remotely as significant a market force as MacOS users, and *dramatically* more difficult to support thanks to platform fragmentation. Even when software is ported over, it's frequently a half-assed port with enough glaring issues that running the Windows version in WINE is the better option.

    As for Mac - all I can say is that I grieve that *Apple* has become the face of consumer-friendly mainstream operating systems - because they're pretty much as hostile and imperious as ever.

    • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Monday June 25 2018, @12:41AM (1 child)

      by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 25 2018, @12:41AM (#697855) Homepage Journal

      I'd be delighted if they just debugged their Windows versions in Wine. Wine is a perfectly good piece of free software.

    • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Monday June 25 2018, @02:35PM

      by urza9814 (3954) on Monday June 25 2018, @02:35PM (#698134) Journal

      Libre Office is wonderful, and I use it for my own work - but the moment I need to collaborate with someone else - it's got to be MS Office - 90% compatibility just doesn't cut it when you're trying to get work done. And yeah,that one is totally the fault of MS and their intentional file format sabotage, but that doesn't let me get away from it (though I always savor the moments when I get to rescue old MS Office files using LO, since age or corruption has made them incompatible with MS Office's fragile file loader.

      Eh...I used to do that, but 95% of the time I'd jump through hoops to find some legitimate MS Office install that I could use, only to find that MS Office had *the exact same problems* with the file as LO did. So I gave up on even trying that. If a file loads weird in LO, it loads weird and I deal with it. MS Office users are generally used to those issues since, as you said, they have to deal with it often enough just loading files from different versions of Office. I've never once had a complaint. Although when possible I save in PDF, which eliminates all issues for static documents...last time I checked that isn't supported on MS Office without installing special printer drivers and "printing" to PDF...