Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Ubuntu Data Collection Report is Out -- First Look at Desktop Metrics

posted by martyb on Sunday June 24 2018, @08:05PM   Printer-friendly
from the show-me-the-numbers dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

The Ubuntu blog has a report on installation metrics:

We first announced our intention to ask users to provide basic, not-personally-identifiable system data back in February.  Since then we have built the Ubuntu Report tool and integrated it in to the Ubuntu 18.04 LTS initial setup tool.  You can see an example of the data being collected on the Ubuntu Report Github page.

At first login users are asked if they would like to send the information gathered and can preview that data if they wish.

One thing to point out is that this data is entirely from Ubuntu Desktop installs only and does not include users of Ubuntu Server, Ubuntu Core, our cloud images, or any of the Ubuntu derivatives that do not include the ubuntu-report software in their installer.

For example, the average install took 18 minutes, but some systems were able to install in less than 8 minutes. Available RAM was most frequently reported at 4GB followed closely by 8GB, but there were systems reporting in with as little as 1GB and as much as 128GB.

How do your system(s) compare?

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Ubuntu Data Collection Report is Out -- First Look at Desktop Metrics | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 61 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @10:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @10:21PM (#698420)

    I wanted to try Solus back when it was newer just because that DE looked real pretty and it wasn't in any other distro's repo, but the Marvell ATA drivers for the SSD in my laptop weren't in their kernel, weren't in a year later, and probably still aren't. Quite a few distros do that, probably because the default kernel make config doesn't include them and saving a few kb is obviously more important than shipping a kernel that works for more than the main dev. Who needs drivers for popular wifi dongles? Bluetooth HID? Nah, if I have to compile my own kernel to get past the second screen in your gui installer I'll run something with a bit more sense about how to put shit together.