Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday June 24 2018, @10:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the solo-failure dept.

Lucasfilm "Licking Their Wounds" But Not Halting 'Star Wars' Development

Mild spoilers in TFA about certain characters that appear in the film.

Disney and Lucasfilm are reassessing their plans for future Star Wars movies in the wake of the disappointing performance of Solo: A Star Wars Story, which is having to fight to make much more than $350 million worldwide, sources tell The Hollywood Reporter. "They haven't slowed down development," says a source with knowledge of Lucasfilm's thinking, "but they are licking their wounds."

Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy and her team are regrouping and figuring out the direction of the movies beyond the final installment of the main series of films, Star Wars: Episode IX, which is scheduled for release Dec. 20, 2019. "It doesn't mean those spinoffs don't happen," says another insider of Solo's underperformance globally. "It just means they're trying to figure out how to make, and market, them differently."

[...] "They were developing anything and everything," says another exec. "It was a case of them stuffing so much sausage and not try to break the casing."

Meanwhile, Han Solo's blaster was sold for over 0.1% of the film's gross.

Also at Collider, Space.com, and Forbes (archive).

Related: Star Wars Franchise Loses Fourth Director in Two Years
Meet the New Star Wars IX Director: J. J. Abrams


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by takyon on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:02PM (13 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:02PM (#697777) Journal

    The main reason the first movie was good was because of the aggressive editing job that was done on the film (by people who weren't George Lucas).

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by JoeMerchant on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:12PM (1 child)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:12PM (#697789)

    A big part of why the first movie was so well received was its competition in the theaters for the previous 5 years.

    A big part of why the series endured was the second movie, Empire really was an impressive sequel. It has been somewhat milking it ever since, but still an entertaining ride.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @02:08PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @02:08PM (#698125)

      Don't forget John Williams and the #1 ranked film score of all time.

      http://www.afi.com/100years/scores.aspx [afi.com]

  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:14PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:14PM (#697792)
    • (Score: 4, Informative) by AthanasiusKircher on Monday June 25 2018, @12:48AM (6 children)

      by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Monday June 25 2018, @12:48AM (#697860) Journal

      Well, she is named Marcia Lcuas [wikipedia.org], and she won the Academy Award for Best Film Editing for Star Wars, so I'd hardly say she's been "erased from Star Wars history."

      But yes, her contributions have perhaps been underappreciated.

      • (Score: 3, Funny) by AthanasiusKircher on Monday June 25 2018, @12:49AM (4 children)

        by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Monday June 25 2018, @12:49AM (#697862) Journal

        [Lucas, obviously... that's what I get for trying to make a correction.]

        • (Score: 2) by takyon on Monday June 25 2018, @12:57AM (3 children)

          by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Monday June 25 2018, @12:57AM (#697868) Journal

          So thoroughly erased from history, nobody can get her name right.

          --
          [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
          • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @01:11AM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @01:11AM (#697873)

            For future reference, it's Martha Lcuas.

            • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday June 25 2018, @05:03PM

              by bob_super (1357) on Monday June 25 2018, @05:03PM (#698202)

              The world has decided to forget any movie in which Martha is a significant plot contributor.

          • (Score: 4, Touché) by JoeMerchant on Monday June 25 2018, @02:19AM

            by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday June 25 2018, @02:19AM (#697907)

            These are not the Lucases you are looking for...

            --
            🌻🌻 [google.com]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @09:14PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 25 2018, @09:14PM (#698391)

        "Marcia Marcia Marcia!"

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Gaaark on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:45PM (1 child)

    by Gaaark (41) on Sunday June 24 2018, @11:45PM (#697812) Journal

    I heard one of the main editors was George's wife who he later fired after their divorce.

    Then the films went to shit.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Monday June 25 2018, @02:57AM

    by Arik (4543) on Monday June 25 2018, @02:57AM (#697922) Journal
    And then, unfortunately, somehow he got his hands on the footage after. And kept on destroying it.

    It is quite an odd situation, the man who gets official credit for the movie may well be the only person on the credits who was truly worse than useless.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?