Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday June 27 2018, @12:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-face-rings-a-bell dept.

Microsoft improves facial recognition across skin tones, gender

Facial recognition is everywhere. The technology is used in China to make kids pay attention and in California to order burgers. You can of course use your face to unlock your iPhone, but the tech also has the potential to screen passengers at US airports and recognize criminals. These last two uses are problematic, as the tech isn't ready to handle darker skin tones and genders. Microsoft hopes to help fix this problem with improved facial recognition technology the company claims has reduced error rates for men and women with darker skin by 20 percent.

According to Microsoft, commercially-available software performs best on males with lighter skin and the worst on females with darker skin. The new software system the company has been testing was able to reduce error rates by nine times for all women and significantly improve accuracy across all demographics.

Also at The Verge and TechCrunch.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 27 2018, @07:30PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 27 2018, @07:30PM (#699447)

    Dafuq does that even mean?

    Well, it obvious to every one, Runaway! Here, let me explain it for you. . . . Wait, what am I thinking? There is a reason you have no idea what it means, and I do not think I can overcome your cognitive deficit.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 28 2018, @11:11AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 28 2018, @11:11AM (#699759)

    It's obvious to me that you can not explain it because you did not. Were you able to, your weak jab at Runaway would have been much more effective.
    Instead you are exposed as a buffoon, who attempts to mock someone without knowing the extent of your own ignorance.