Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 27 2018, @05:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the good-question dept.

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to know if cell-site simulators, also known as Stingrays, have the potential to interfere with mobile communications, and he's asked the FCC to share any research it has done into the matter. In a letter sent to Chairman Ajit Pai today, Wyden asked what steps the agency had taken to ensure the devices -- which track mobile devices by mimicking cell towers -- don't interfere with the communications of targeted and non-targeted devices or calls to 911, specifically. "The FCC has an obligation to ensure that surveillance technology which it certifies does not interfere with emergency services or the mobile communications of innocent Americans who are in the same neighborhood where law enforcement is using a cell-site simulator," he wrote.

Wyden asks for information about any testing conducted by or required by the FCC regarding the disruption of communications and if no tests have been performed, he wants to know why. Along with 911 call interference, he also asks about the potential disruption of wireless internet access, effects on the battery life of mobile devices as well as interference with Real Time Texting devices, hearing aids, cochlear implants and Wireless Emergency Alerts.

Earlier this year, the Department of Homeland Security informed Wyden that it found what appeared to be Stingrays in Washington DC, though the agency failed to say how many they found evidence of, who might be operating them or why. In his letter to Pai, Wyden said that DHS also told him that it doesn't conduct any tests of the cell-site simulators it uses, nor does it fund outside testing of communication interference. He added that the Department of Justice refused to provide any publicly accessible information on the matter.

Source: https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/26/senator-fcc-stingray-interfere-911-calls/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Thursday June 28 2018, @08:01PM (1 child)

    by Freeman (732) on Thursday June 28 2018, @08:01PM (#699954) Journal

    Which an individual would spend a very long time in prison for doing.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Friday June 29 2018, @07:06AM

    by sjames (2882) on Friday June 29 2018, @07:06AM (#700151) Journal

    Exactly. That brings up a great criterion. If a private citizen would go to jail for doing it, a warrant is required.

    Further, the stingray must not even display information for any person not named specifically in the warrant, including indicating their presence.