Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Thursday June 28 2018, @01:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the reality-check dept.

Submitted via IRC for Fnord666

Reality Winner pleads guilty to leaking NSA election hacking data

Reality Winner was expected to plead guilty to leaking NSA data, and she's done just that. The whistleblower has officially pleaded guilty to a charge of unlawful retention and dissemination of national defense information. Sentencing will have to wait, but the felony carries a maximum penalty of 63 months (5.25 years) with up to three years of supervised release.

Winner faced the charge after giving The Intercept NSA documents that showed Russia's military intelligence wing, the GRU, attempting to hijack the computers of 122 local election officials ahead of the 2016 American vote. The NSA had determined that Russia wanted to collect information about election-related hardware and software in what could have been a precursor to manipulating the vote itself.

Previously: Feds Arrest NSA Contractor in Leak of Top Secret Russia Document
Reality Winner NSA Leak Details Revealed by Court Transcript


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Thursday June 28 2018, @08:48AM (3 children)

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Thursday June 28 2018, @08:48AM (#699727) Homepage Journal

    I've seen more than one online rag that had a hidden service to which one may submit anonymous tips

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by canopic jug on Thursday June 28 2018, @01:08PM (2 children)

    by canopic jug (3949) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 28 2018, @01:08PM (#699777) Journal

    This wasn't enough in her case. They published the more or less raw documents which allowed the investigators to figure out who had printed them. If The Intercept wanted to protect her, one of the things they would have done would have been to re-key the documents prior to publishing and even then only publishing excerpts. This was all common knowledge even before Snowden so there's no excuse they can claim for doing it like they did except that they wanted to make sure she was identified quickly.

    --
    Money is not free speech. Elections should not be auctions.