Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 29 2018, @12:19AM   Printer-friendly
from the how-does-that-compare-to-pilots? dept.

Flight attendants get more uterine, thyroid and other cancers, study finds

A flight attendant's life may look glamorous, but the job comes with health hazards that go beyond managing surly passengers. As a group, they get certain cancers more than the general population, according to a new study.

Scientists have long found that flight attendants get more breast cancer and melanoma. The new study, published Monday in the journal Environmental Health [open, DOI: 10.1186/s12940-018-0396-8], saw the same trend and detected a higher prevalence of every other cancer the researchers examined: Non-melanoma skin cancer, uterine, gastrointestinal, cervical and thyroid cancers were all seen at a higher rate in flight attendants.

"Something that somewhat surprised us, to some extent, was that we also saw a higher instance of breast cancer in women with three or more children," said study co-author Irina Mordukhovich, a research associate at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Typically, the more children a woman has, the lower her risk of breast cancer. A previous study showed a result similar to the new breast cancer finding [open, DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taw055] [DX], she said, but Mordukhovich didn't expect those findings would be replicated. "Women with three or more children are already probably not getting enough sleep," Mordukhovich said. "Combine that with this disruption from the job, especially for those who fly internationally, this may be an indication that the circadian rhythm disruption is having an impact."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by driverless on Friday June 29 2018, @01:33AM (1 child)

    by driverless (4770) on Friday June 29 2018, @01:33AM (#700060)

    That's not surprising, you get about 1000cpm of gamma up there vs. about 10cpm at ground level (I won't try converting it into Gy/h, Sv/h, or whatever, way too complex :-). A rule of thumb is that over 100cpm you should start to worry if it's long-term exposure (again, lots of stuff about exposure rate and tissue absorbed dose elided).

    Oh yeah, running a clicking geiger counter on a plane gets you odd looks. Just saying.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday June 29 2018, @01:38AM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday June 29 2018, @01:38AM (#700066) Homepage

    Hey, scientist, put down your lab coat and live in the real-world for a bit.