Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Monday July 02 2018, @06:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the trademarked-thing-losing-its-luster dept.

Dave Lindorff reports via CounterPunch

Over a generation ago, engineer Bill Smith, working at Motorola, developed a management system called Six-Sigma, designed to help companies avoid quality problems in their products and business processes. His system caught morphed[sic] into a general theory of management, and became a catch-word and marketing goldmine at business schools as well as requirement for promotion at large corporations.

In 1995, Jack Welsh, CEO of GE, made Six-Sigma central to his company's whole management approach. If you wanted to be promoted at that leading Fortune 100 industrial firm, you needed to be certified in Six-Sigma. Other companies followed suit and today most large US corporations and many abroad, as well as some public organizations (including the US military), claim to adhere to the model, and to promote management personnel based upon their having achieved so-called "black belt" or "green belt" status in understanding its precepts.

Indeed, GE's success in growing rapidly and achieving record profits year after year made Welsh and Six-Sigma (a trademarked term owned by Motorola) a leading model for top-level managers everywhere.

Jump forward, though, and GE is now being called an epic management disaster by analysts. The company, with Welsh at the helm, famously expanded into banking and financial services, got caught with its corporate pants down in the Fiscal Crisis and Great Recession that hit in 2007, and is now going through a wrenching divestment and break-up process that has seen its stock price fall from a high of $87 a share in August of 2000, when everything seemed to be humming along nicely, to today's low of $12.88, a level that valued the company at 50% of what it had been worth just a year ago.

Last week, in a final indignity, the company, which had been one of the original Dow Industrial Average listings when that index was created back in 1896, was kicked off that widely followed list of Wall Street's largest and most important firms, embarrassingly replaced by the pharmacy chain Walgreens.

[...] Welsh noted that his performance as a manager would be judged not by what happened to the company under his watch, but by how it did in the decades after his departure.

The answer is now in: disastrously.

The same actually can be said about many of the US companies that adopted Welsh's vaunted Six-Sigma model for strategic management.

The question then, is why nobody in business journalism is questioning Six-Sigma.

[...] the company has become an object lesson in why both Six-Sigma and GE's approach to growth by acquisition and diversification should be viewed with great suspicion.

And yet, instead there is just silence.

[...] US politicians of both major parties, and especially Republicans, are quick to say that government agencies should be run more "like a business". The Trump administration has taken that even further, putting actual businesspeople in charge of many of the government's key departments and agencies. Are these department secretaries and agency heads going to be applying the discredited GE Six-Sigma model to the government operations they direct?

[...] It sure would be great if the Department of Defense, the National Security Agency, the CIA, the DEA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Bureau of Land [Management], and the Commerce Department, at least, could get the GE treatment.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by anubi on Monday July 02 2018, @08:04AM (6 children)

    by anubi (2828) on Monday July 02 2018, @08:04AM (#701232) Journal

    You know, the guy on the shop floor likely knows more about how to do his thing than anyone else in the organization. Especially if he's been doing it for years. What it it that people think social status overrides competency?

    No, I would not put it past, say, the mechanic who works on my van to design my transmission controller. That's my thing. But I would take his advice in high esteem to tell me if he thinks its working right once its in. He would "feel" things that aren't right and will lead to structural failure. He's been working on transmissions his whole life, and knows far more than me about how one should work and what will destruct them - he will sense things I would never see on my test equipment, that is, if I was even aware of what to set it up to look for.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 02 2018, @08:21AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 02 2018, @08:21AM (#701236)

    Yeah. Long ago I worked out how to be an effective engineering consultant -- look for the person on the shop floor that knows what's going on, ask them what's good and what needs work. Then take that info up to management, since internal communication rarely works in the "up" direction. I was always happy to tell the managers who I learned from, but they were rarely interested. If there isn't anyone on the shop floor or in some supporting group like plant engineering who knows what's going on, the operation is probably on the way down.

    Richard Feynman obviously knew this -- when appointed to the Challenger investigation (space shuttle crash) he was the only one on the commission who went to the assembly area to interview the people that built the rockets & engines--
        http://www.feynman.com/science/the-challenger-disaster/ [feynman.com]

    Fortune cookie seems appropriate:
    Beauty is truth, truth beauty, that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know. -- John Keats

    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 02 2018, @11:12AM (2 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 02 2018, @11:12AM (#701272) Journal

      We are doing something weird and different at work. I've never seen or heard it before, but your post sounds kinda close.

      Each year, Corporate does a survey of it's employees. I've been caught in a Catch-22 because I couldn't enter the information they wanted, regarding *my* supervisor. That is, the design of the questionnaire was - uhhh - twisted, I guess, so that it reflected on management as a whole, in most places. I complained that *my* input should reflect on *my* supervisor, not on management as a whole.

      Someone listened. The most recent survey reveals that as a group, our plant management does an adequate job. However, *my* supervisor's rating ranks somewhere between the sewer and the abyss.

      As a result, we are having some meetings, in which, we are trying to spell out what is wrong, and how to fix them.

      I don't expect a helluva lot from it. For starters, the man is nucking phutts. Some kind of schizo bullshit, he can't stay on track for ten minutes, and won't allow you to do so either. Second - HR is in charge of the meetings. Fek - gotta clean up your language, and talk carefully, so most of the guys would rather stay quiet. There are two of us in the meetings though, who are willing and able to shine the light of reason on all the stupid behind-the-scenes shit.

      The question is, will any of this have an effect on day-to-day operations?

      TBH, this supervisor really doesn't mess with me a lot. He went through a little spell, when everything everyone said to him was "disrespectful". He left me an idiot note one day, and I took it to HR, showind her how "disrespectful" the "young puppy" was to his elders. We went round and round over that one - if it had been recorded it probably would have looked like a Laurel and Hardy act.

      But, I do get tired of listening to a near-moron run at the mouth all the time. Maybe, just maybe, things will improve . . .

      • (Score: 1) by anubi on Monday July 02 2018, @02:29PM (1 child)

        by anubi (2828) on Monday July 02 2018, @02:29PM (#701367) Journal

        Sometimes, all you can do is shut up and watch the train wreck.

        --
        "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
        • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday July 02 2018, @03:36PM

          by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 02 2018, @03:36PM (#701410) Journal

          The light bulb replacement was not scheduled in this sprint.

          --
          To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by suburbanitemediocrity on Monday July 02 2018, @02:46PM (1 child)

    by suburbanitemediocrity (6844) on Monday July 02 2018, @02:46PM (#701379)

    This is why engineers with real world experience are valuable. By the time I got my first engineering job, I had 15 years experience in the field as a hobby.

    An old coworker from the Apollo days told me a story about the V2 (he was an old Nazi). The Germans were having trouble building pumps for the engines and Hitler did a countrywide search for someone who could come up with a design and it was found that fire departments already had something that would meet the requirements.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 03 2018, @02:02AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 03 2018, @02:02AM (#701683)

      I read that fire pump story somewhere, maybe in Walter Dornberger's book, "V2" (also a Nazi who wound up at Bell Aircraft/Aerospace.) Think about the flow rate if they needed fire pumps to feed the rocket engine...

      There is no mention of forced/slave labor in "V2" which focuses almost exclusively on the technology development, but a friend's father worked at Bell. I asked and he was certain that, as a high level manager, Dornberger was aware of working conditions in the 3rd Reich rocket factories.