Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday July 02 2018, @12:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the life-after-death dept.

Two lawyers are still fighting to keep Buck Rogers from entering the public domain, something which should have begun 70 years after the author's death. Philip Nowlan, the stories' author, died in 1940 and so his works should have joined the public domain starting 2010. Part of the strategy from the copyright trolls has been to drag out the process with multiple lawsuits.

Back in October 2015 we brought you the story of the Buck Rogers Copyright Trolls, two lawyers who were fighting to keep Buck Rogers from entering the public domain using the discredited Sherlock Holmes system of licensing. Two and a half years later, Louise Geer and Dan Herman are still at it, using every trick in the book to keep a beloved tale out of the public domain, where it firmly belongs. Along the way the pair have stiffed multiple law firms, and currently are abusing a Bankruptcy Court in Pennsylvania in a Hail Mary effort to...well, it's not exactly clear what they're trying to do.

From Boing Boing : The continuing saga of Buck Rogers and the Copyright Trolls


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Alfred on Monday July 02 2018, @07:44PM (2 children)

    by Alfred (4006) on Monday July 02 2018, @07:44PM (#701550) Journal
    I disagree with the compulsion to sell part of it. It leaves you vulnerable to hostile takeover. Can you propose something that is not dependent on the "worth" of the work? I would be content with a value set only by the age of the work. Especially if it grows exponentially.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Mykl on Monday July 02 2018, @11:46PM

    by Mykl (1112) on Monday July 02 2018, @11:46PM (#701639)

    Perhaps this should be that you have to EITHER:

    • Sell the copyright at the offered price (assuming genuine offer); OR
    • Raise the 'value' of your work to a figure higher than the offer, and continue to pay copyright ownership fees based on the new, higher price

    At some point, it needs to become economically unviable to continue to pay for extended copyright.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Reziac on Tuesday July 03 2018, @03:10AM

    by Reziac (2489) on Tuesday July 03 2018, @03:10AM (#701711) Homepage

    Someone on the Green Site once proposed this:

    Initial copyright registration, say for 14 years from first publication date: free
    Renewal, say for 7 years: fee, inexpensive enough for entry-level users
    Every 7 years thereafter: renewal fee doubles

    So how much you pay is directly proportional to how long you hang onto it. And after a certain point, even Mickey Mouse isn't worth the cost.

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.