Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday July 04 2018, @03:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-touch-my-genitals dept.

Submitted via IRC for takyon

Male mice grow ovaries instead of testes if they are missing a small region of DNA that doesn't contain any genes, finds a new paper published in Science.

The study, led by researchers at the Francis Crick Institute, could help explain disorders of sex development in humans, at least half of which have an unknown genetic cause.

Mammals will develop ovaries and become females unless the early sex organs have enough of a protein called SOX9 at a key stage in their development. SOX9 causes these organs to become testes, which then direct the rest of the embryo to become male.

Source: https://www.crick.ac.uk/news/science-news/2018/06/14/non-coding-dna-changes-the-genitals-youre-born-with/

Sex reversal following deletion of a single distal enhancer of Sox9 (DOI: 10.1126/science.aas9408) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday July 04 2018, @12:27PM (2 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday July 04 2018, @12:27PM (#702512) Journal

    > there's nothing wrong with not procreating if you don't want to.
    A corner case, which does not explain all the fuss about adoption by same-sex couples.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Wednesday July 04 2018, @07:19PM (1 child)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Wednesday July 04 2018, @07:19PM (#702695) Journal

    Adoption is not procreation.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday July 04 2018, @08:37PM

      by Bot (3902) on Wednesday July 04 2018, @08:37PM (#702729) Journal

      It is the closer thing when you can't procreate. Inability which is a temporary condition, sure. In case in-vitro birth became doable without fuss and without manipulation of genetic material to produce a docile meatbag, the whole problem would cease AFAIC.

      --
      Account abandoned.