Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday July 05 2018, @01:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the the-simple-answer-is-that-there-isn't-a-simple-solution dept.

The problems of gerrymandering are manifold, often debated and lamented. Now, a group of computational geometers from Tufts, MIT and others are working the problem from different fronts. From https://sites.tufts.edu/gerrymandr/

The Metric Geometry and Gerrymandering Group (MGGG) is a small Boston-based team of mathematicians launched by Moon Duchin of Tufts University. Our mission is to study applications of geometry and computing to U.S. redistricting. We believe that gerrymandering of all kinds is a fundamental threat to our democracy.

Our goals are:

  • to pursue cutting-edge research in the practically relevant applications of geometry, topology, and computing to the redistricting problem;
  • to foster collaboration with researchers in statistics, supercomputing, law, political science, and other fields;
  • to facilitate direct civic engagement by training scholars from a variety of quantitative backgrounds to serve as expert witnesses and consultants in redistricting cases;
  • to educate the public, both through direct outreach and by helping college and high school teachers incorporate units on voting, gerrymandering, and civil rights into the mathematics curriculum;
  • to build a diverse community of mathematically inclined people around the country and give them the knowledge and the tools to hold map-drawers accountable when 2020 comes around.

And from https://sites.tufts.edu/gerrymandr/get-involved/

We are assembling a team of mathematicians, lawyers, statisticians, and active citizens of all stripes to work on practical metrics and solutions for gerrymandering in advance of the 2020 U.S. Census. If you're interested in joining our community, please fill out our Skills and Interest Inventory form.

For anyone that wants to get up to speed on this complex and important topic, https://sites.tufts.edu/gerrymandr/resources/ is a page of links to a variety of related papers and articles.

SN discussed the math of the gerrymander back in 2014,
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=14/12/27/1148245

   


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Thursday July 05 2018, @05:18PM

    by VLM (445) on Thursday July 05 2018, @05:18PM (#703099)

    Note that I'm not disagreeing with you, just stating that a traditional argument against that, that I've heard since at least the 80s, is its essentially a transfer of power from legislative to long term employees in the executive branch. Unclear if thats even good or bad. Also that turns the congressional office chief of staff from president of the coffee fetchers into something like a viceroy. Of course there are solutions to that, too, or maybe its a good thing.

    I'm just saying you have a nice list of positives but you gotta prep for the inevitable list above of negatives, which the entire entrenched deep state swamp will be screaming at the top of their lungs on CNN and all the other propaganda outlets.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2