Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Thursday July 05 2018, @04:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the we're-from-the-future dept.

Next Big Future reports:

Liquid Piston gets more DARPA funding for 30KW engine 30 times smaller than todays engines

DARPA has awarded LiquidPiston an additional $2.5 million to continue development of its 30kW X4 rotary diesel engine prototype, bringing DARPA's total funding of the engine technology to $6 million.

When development of the fully packaged engine is complete, the 30kW X4 engine is expected to weigh just 30lbs and fit into a 10" box, while achieving 45% brake thermal efficiency – approximately an order of magnitude smaller and lighter than traditional piston diesel engines, and also 30% more efficient. The efficient, lightweight, and powerful rotary Diesel/JP-8 X4 engine offers a disruptive power solution for direct as well as hybrid electric propulsion and power generation.

Seems we get a story about a wonderous alt-energy breakthrough every week that never pans out, can the humble Diesel engine be reinvented to become the "next big thing?"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday July 05 2018, @08:54PM (2 children)

    by Immerman (3985) on Thursday July 05 2018, @08:54PM (#703230)

    On the plus side, methane has no C-C bonds to worry about, so that should simplify things considerably. It also liquefies relatively easily, and is lighter than air so that in an accident all the fumes will rapidly depart the scene rather than hanging around to pose a serious explosion risk like gasoline does.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 06 2018, @01:53AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 06 2018, @01:53AM (#703344)
    Methane has C-H bonds, which are similarly strong. Direct methane fuel cells run at elevated temperatures.
    • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Friday July 06 2018, @01:36PM

      by Immerman (3985) on Friday July 06 2018, @01:36PM (#703471)

      I suppose the inherent cost of more energy dense fuels is that the bonds contain more energy, and are thus stronger and require more energy to break. A small price to pay, even if it means the fuel cells may not be suitable for consumer electronics for quite some time.