Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Tuesday July 17 2018, @12:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the here-we-go-again dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Former staff from scandal-hit Cambridge Analytica (CA) have set up another data analysis company.

Auspex International will be "ethically based" and offer "boutique geopolitical consultancy" services, according to its website.

CA was shut down by its parent company, SCL Elections, which itself faces criminal charges over failure to supply data when requested.

Auspex will work in the Middle East and Africa initially.

The company was set up by Ahmed Al-Khatib, a former director of Emerdata, which was also created in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal to continue the work it was doing.

In a press release announcing the new company, he says CA's collapse was a "bitter disappointment" to him.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Wednesday July 18 2018, @05:20AM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Wednesday July 18 2018, @05:20AM (#708679) Homepage Journal

    Just to clarify, bribery is not an output of culture but income inequality. It does ride on culture though.

    If they are moving to places that don't do that it gives them an early advantage through the difficult transition of language, laws, culture.

    It requires 2 to tango. Since offering a bribe is also an offense, just as taking one, immigrants offering a bribe won't work if native won't take it. So then why would they? Only if there is huge income inequality, and most probably because law enforcer isn't getting paid well.

    In the long term it can turn native-born against them or rub off on their hosts.

    There is absolutely no basis behind assuming native-born aren't against immigrants from the beginning. They almost always are. This is basic sociology. [wikipedia.org] Logical conclusion is that immigrants are successful because of two reasons: perseverance and undeniable need for their work.

    In fact, hatred against immigrants is worst in western countries because most of the Europe is basically a bunch of tribes who got rich over the hard-work and cunning perseverance of its own immigrants.

    You are right about the advantages of lack of bribery-culture, but it is not a cause it is a symptom. It is important to make this distinction because otherwise it will crop-up in your country and guess who will be blamed for that? The same group of people who have been blamed for everything by Europeans since forever - out-group.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2