Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday July 17 2018, @06:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the correct-horse-battery-staple dept.

More than a decade after first examining the issue, research by the University of Plymouth has shown most of the top 10 English-speaking websites offer little or no advice guidance on creating passwords that are less likely to be hacked.

Some still allow people to use the word 'password', while others will allow single-character passwords and basic words including a person's surname or a repeat of their user identity.

Professor of Information Security Steve Furnell conducted the research, having carried out similar assessments in 2007, 2011 and 2014.

Have password restrictions ever helped?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by legont on Wednesday July 18 2018, @12:59AM

    by legont (4179) on Wednesday July 18 2018, @12:59AM (#708599)

    Some suckers ask two questions and want them both correct. However, your idea is good, thank you.

    I personally use a private password generator with two seeds - master one and one related to the name of the target. This way I don't have to store passwords and they are sufficiently difficult. Works fine except the algorithm can't fit sometimes opposite requirements.

    --
    "Wealth is the relentless enemy of understanding" - John Kenneth Galbraith.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2