Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 18 2018, @08:38AM   Printer-friendly
from the still-growing-but-not-[as]-fast-[enough] dept.

Netflix shares plunged by more than 14% in after-hours trade on Monday, after the firm reported disappointing subscriber growth.

Netflix said it added 5.2 million subscribers in the three months to the end of June, the same number it did during the period last year.

The streaming service had forecast growth of 6.2 million.

The decline in share price follows a successful run for the stock, which had roughly doubled so far this year.

Is the number of Netflix subscribers reaching a plateau based on its current library of titles, or are competitors eating into its growth?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Wednesday July 18 2018, @04:48PM (3 children)

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 18 2018, @04:48PM (#708869) Journal

    eternal growth is impossible.

    As long as population keeps growing, so can business...

    The growth that you speak of that's possible if the potential customer base grows with the population is not the growth that the business forecasters who are now apparently disappointed and surprised speak of.

    They are talking about a continued, sustained growth rate that keeps pace with the growth has been occurring for some time.

    You're talking about a reasonable, rational, reality-based growth rate that's much slower (and more sustainable) than what they are talking about. Because the reality-based one is slower, they count that one as "not growth" in the comparatively fast sense that they were talking about.

    To my way of thinking, services like netflix have plenty of room for that faster growth if two conditions are met:

    1. Cable Television companies still have customers
    2. People who "gotta see" some set of shows still exist

    I am pretty sure these two conditions still exist, providing the strategy of taking customers (#2) away from competition (#1), but I don't think my way of thinking much resembles their way of thinking either.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday July 18 2018, @04:54PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday July 18 2018, @04:54PM (#708872)

    Netflix's growth to-date has been ridiculously astounding, to expect it to continue like that forever is foolish. I agree, they will most likely rebound from the current setback and continue to grow "fast" in the future.

    They basically combined "free bandwidth" of the internet with the killer bandwidth app: video entertainment, and managed to dominate the market.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 18 2018, @06:19PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 18 2018, @06:19PM (#708916)

      What "rebound" are you talking about? They grew this quarter JUST AS FAST as they did in the same quarter last year.

      The idiots on wall street are bitching because it didn't grow FASTER.

      • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Wednesday July 18 2018, @07:34PM

        by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 18 2018, @07:34PM (#708959) Journal

        They grew this quarter JUST AS FAST

        So, if their growth did not grow, but only remained the same, THAT'S STAGNATION! I guess. Growth has to be growing for the growth to be growth. A slightly smaller growth rate, see, would be a SHRINKING growth rate, and everyone who forecasts for businesses and stock bettors and bookmakers knows that shrinking is bad for growth.