Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 18 2018, @06:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the here's-to-many-more dept.

Tuesday at OSCON, the Open Source Initiative (OSI) has continued the celebration of 20 years of open source. A blog post at the OSI reflects on how Open Source fits in with pre-existing intitiatives.

Open source did not emerge from a void. It was consciously a marketing programme for the already-15-year-old idea of free software and arose in the context of both the GNU Project and the BSD community and their history (stretching back to the late 70s). We chose to reflect this in the agenda for our celebration track at OSCON.

But that doesn't mean its inception is irrelevant. The consensus to define open source at the VA Linux meeting and the subsequent formation of OSI and acceptance of the Open Source Definition changed the phrase from descriptive to a term of art accepted globally. It created a movement and a market and consequently spread software freedom far beyond anyone's expectations. That has to be worth celebrating.

Wikipedia's entry on Open Source provides a great deal of information on its origin and application in multiple fields besides just software.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday July 18 2018, @10:22PM (4 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday July 18 2018, @10:22PM (#709043)

    I like the MIT license, BSD isn't bad either. Here's the code, have at it. You can't sue me and I can't sue you.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 19 2018, @02:15AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 19 2018, @02:15AM (#709145)

    I'll take your code, squash some bugs, and substantially improve it. Thanks, my product is awesome now. Then I'll lock it down and never give you back the improvements. Not even interested in collaborating with you but feel free to BSD license any fixes you might make.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday July 19 2018, @07:49PM (1 child)

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday July 19 2018, @07:49PM (#709592)

      Thanks, my product is awesome now. Then I'll lock it down and never give you back the improvements.

      A. Are you trying to be hurtful? Because that's the weakest form of envy-ooooooh that's not faaaaaaaair-hurt I can imagine.

      B. How do you think that's any different from what most software thieves do with GPL and every other form of available-for-inspection source anyway?

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 20 2018, @03:40AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 20 2018, @03:40AM (#709780)

        A. Corporations don't feel envy.
        B. Is that a solvable problem?

        Anyway, that's why *I* use GPL instead of other licenses. It's interesting to let loose a creation and see what other people do with it. Much better than having code I write hoovered up by some corporation never to be seen again. Works for me, might not work for everyone.

  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday July 19 2018, @01:51PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 19 2018, @01:51PM (#709375) Journal

    I also like MIT and BSD. I also like Apache 2.

    --
    People today are educated enough to repeat what they are taught but not to question what they are taught.