Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 18 2018, @08:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the less-is-more dept.

El Reg:

Five years ago, a collective mania overtook the industry. Nobody could think of a clear reason why consumers needed an expensive "smart" watch when they already had a smartphone in their hand, pocket or bag. What value could it deliver? Even Google didn't seem sure: in its now notorious launch video, a punter used a watch simply to replicate features on their phone. But the industry convinced itself that wearables were another platform, and nobody wanted to be a sad second in this race. So the giants entered the market. Not because they wanted to, but as a hedge. Someone else might take a lead.

As we predicted in 2014, this was a solution looking for a problem. And an expensive one, at that.

Are wearable devices whose OS wakes up only when needed for smart features the answer?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by boltronics on Thursday July 19 2018, @12:34PM

    by boltronics (580) on Thursday July 19 2018, @12:34PM (#709342) Homepage Journal

    Yeah that sounds crazy. It might make sense if GPS+GLONASS is on all the time, or the backlight is permanently on a higher setting.

    My watch claims to work for 2 weeks in normal watch mode, but I've never been more than 2 days without switching to GPS tracking for a run or ride so I get a bit over a week on a charge. I just charge it each Friday night since I'll usually do longer runs over the weekend.

    --
    It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2