Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

U.S. to Make More Drugs Easily Available, Cutting Role Docs Play

posted by mrpg on Thursday July 19 2018, @09:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the nobody-thinks-of-the-doctors dept.

Phoenix666 writes:

Bloomberg:

Americans may soon be able to get cholesterol-lowering medications and other widely used prescription drugs without seeing a doctor, a first step in what could amount to sweeping changes to how patients access treatments for chronic conditions.

The Food and Drug Administration in a draft guideline on Tuesday outlined how such a status, which the agency said could help lower health-care costs, would work. Patients could answer questions on a mobile-phone app to help determine whether they should be able to access a medication without a prescription.

"Our hope is that the steps we're taking to advance this new, more modern framework will contribute to lower costs for our health care system overall and provide greater efficiency and empowerment for consumers by increasing the availability of certain products that would otherwise be available only by prescription," FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said in a statement.

Order your drugs from a smartphone app.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
U.S. to Make More Drugs Easily Available, Cutting Role Docs Play | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 36 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Thursday July 19 2018, @04:53PM (2 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday July 19 2018, @04:53PM (#709488) Journal

    My personal philosophy is that all drugs should be legal for individuals to purchase. This includes all prescription drugs.

    The implementation would be a phased approach where we slowly introduce new drugs in reverse-order of harm. E.g. crack would probably go last.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   4  

  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Thursday July 19 2018, @05:37PM (1 child)

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 19 2018, @05:37PM (#709532) Journal

    I'm not sure I agree about this for anti-biotics, but where the only damage is done to the person taking the drugs I'm fine with it. But I think that the laws allowing the advertising of drugs are far too loose. And I include alcohol on that list. (Not, however, coffee or tea. Despite the humor those are neither excessively dangerous nor addictive, and only slightly habituating.)

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Thursday July 19 2018, @05:45PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday July 19 2018, @05:45PM (#709535) Journal

      I'm not sure I agree about this for anti-biotics, but where the only damage is done to the person taking the drugs I'm fine with it.

      Hmm...hadn't really thought about antibiotics in that frame...

      There is a compelling, direct, harm to the public there.

      However, it's not taking the drugs that's the problem. It's not-taking the drugs that's the problem.

      Id' rather see failing to complete the course of antibiotics be illegal than starting an unapproved course in the first place . Although....I have no idea how you'd implement something like that.