SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Aeon has an interesting article on bullshit:
We live in the age of information, which means that we also live in the age of misinformation. Indeed, you have likely come across more bullshit so far this week than a normal person living 1,000 years ago would in their entire lifetime. If we were to add up every word in every scholarly piece of work published prior to the Enlightenment, this number would still pale in comparison with the number of words used to promulgate bullshit on the internet in the 21st century alone.
If you find your head nodding, start shaking it. I’m bullshitting you.
Ha! I knew it!
How could I possibly know how much bullshit you have come across this week? What if you’re reading this on a Sunday? Who is a ‘normal’ person living 1,000 years ago? And how could I know how much bullshit they had to deal with?
It was very easy to construct this bullshit. Once I set out to impress rather than inform, a burden was lifted from my shoulders and placed onto yours. My opening statements could very well be true, but we have no way of knowing. Their truth or falsity were irrelevant to me, the bullshitter.
[...] In his book, On Bullshit (2005), Frankfurt noted that ‘most people are rather confident of their ability to recognise bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it’. However, more than 98 per cent of our participants rated at least one item in our bullshit receptivity scales to be at least somewhat profound. We are not nearly as good at detecting bullshit as we think.
So, how might you – the reader – vaccinate yourself against it? For a non-spiritualist, it might be relatively easy to recognise when Chopra or Oz are concerned less with the truth than selling books or entertaining viewers. But think back to my opening paragraph. Bullshit is much harder to detect when we want to agree with it. The first and most important step is to recognise the limits of our own cognition. We must be humble about our ability to justify our own beliefs. These are the keys to adopting a critical mindset – which is our only hope in a world so full of bullshit.
(Score: 5, Funny) by bob_super on Thursday July 19 2018, @11:29PM (3 children)
And jmorris is the avatar of the god of Objective Truth.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by jmorris on Friday July 20 2018, @02:02AM (2 children)
Well that should be everyone's goal, right? None can actually hit that goal, but the harder we strive for it the better. Figure out what the facts are and be unafraid to speak them. The rustled jimmies, outraged shrieks and "I just can't even" reactions are most useful; they are bright spotlights on people who are useless in debating that particular issue, showing who should be totally ignored (or trolled for lulz). Those who can face the facts (or even dispute them intelligently), debate the proper weight to assign to them, the logical consequences, etc. are where the actual debate is. "I'm offended" is not an argument.
Screw your feelings. What are the facts, to how many decimal places have they been measured and where are the error bars and footnotes. Then lets see the methodology.
2 + 2 = 4 for all values of 2 and 4*, for all identity groups and regardless of the level of privilege of the person working the problem.
* Assuming base 10 or any base greater than 4 and the custom is to assume numbers are base 10 unless explicitly noted.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 20 2018, @02:09AM
Epic fail. jmorris wants his own integers! What bullshit.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 20 2018, @03:05AM
You calling for facts is making my brain kick my eyeballs from behind trying to get the eyelids to shut.