Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday July 19 2018, @10:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the We-could-keep-this-up-forever dept.

Aeon has an interesting article on bullshit:

We live in the age of information, which means that we also live in the age of misinformation. Indeed, you have likely come across more bullshit so far this week than a normal person living 1,000 years ago would in their entire lifetime. If we were to add up every word in every scholarly piece of work published prior to the Enlightenment, this number would still pale in comparison with the number of words used to promulgate bullshit on the internet in the 21st century alone.

If you find your head nodding, start shaking it. I’m bullshitting you.

Ha! I knew it!

How could I possibly know how much bullshit you have come across this week? What if you’re reading this on a Sunday? Who is a ‘normal’ person living 1,000 years ago? And how could I know how much bullshit they had to deal with?

It was very easy to construct this bullshit. Once I set out to impress rather than inform, a burden was lifted from my shoulders and placed onto yours. My opening statements could very well be true, but we have no way of knowing. Their truth or falsity were irrelevant to me, the bullshitter.

[...] In his book, On Bullshit (2005), Frankfurt noted that ‘most people are rather confident of their ability to recognise bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it’. However, more than 98 per cent of our participants rated at least one item in our bullshit receptivity scales to be at least somewhat profound. We are not nearly as good at detecting bullshit as we think.

So, how might you – the reader – vaccinate yourself against it? For a non-spiritualist, it might be relatively easy to recognise when Chopra or Oz are concerned less with the truth than selling books or entertaining viewers. But think back to my opening paragraph. Bullshit is much harder to detect when we want to agree with it. The first and most important step is to recognise the limits of our own cognition. We must be humble about our ability to justify our own beliefs. These are the keys to adopting a critical mindset – which is our only hope in a world so full of bullshit.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday July 20 2018, @03:54PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday July 20 2018, @03:54PM (#709974) Journal

    By the way, where did I say it did "damage" to this site to publish this? No, I was just pointing out the substantial flaws of TFA (a bit tongue in cheek at the outset). A lot of stuff that gets published online has substantial flaws. That doesn't mean it can't be the opening for productive discussion.

    Agreed.
    However, your reply was quite passionately negative towards TFA, I couldn't detect how far you were willing to go into... ummm... "trashing it into dismission" so to say.

    ---

    Feel free to continue too, rather than just offering metacommentary. (Are you claiming your post was more helpful to the discussion than mine??)

    Just in case you would have had the intention to dismiss it entirely on the grounds of "hodgepodge about bullshit", my post was a counter-weight on the line of "Don't slide into Nirvana fallacy: something can have value even when far from perfect".
    Specifically in this case, tabling some evidence bullshit is not innocuous (not a laughing matter) and perhaps more pervasive than we think we are able to detect.

    ---

    is that he bizarrely dismissed Frankfurt in his original submission while praising TFA. I really don't understand his justification for that perspective...

    Let me try to slightly adjust his form, maybe you'll see another possible interpretation?

    but it is a "fine article", worthy of a(n average) Soylentil's read.

    You see, the magister has this magisterial habit of quite often behaving like he sees himself ex cathedra, well above the level of the average Soylentil (say ain't so, magister - grin).

    ---

    I think you're confusing me with someone else -- perhaps someone who is anti-Aristarchus or who is annoyed by his submissions.

    I wasn't.

    I was just calling out the problems with an article. Try reading what I wrote rather than assuming I have some sort of other agenda.

    Ok, will do.
    I'll invite you to do the same and, perhaps, admit that your "But I cannot for the life of me understand why our resident ancient Greek dude would think TFA is at all worthwhile." does allow for the interpretation of "Is so bad, one can dismiss it and lose nothing".
    Not the only interpretation possible, true, but still a possible one. This is why my intervention, "just in case".

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2