Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday July 24 2018, @08:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-about-the-cheese? dept.

Earth's Moon Could Have Been Habitable 3.5 Billion Years Ago

A new paper by Ian Crawford from the University of London and myself [Dirk Schulze-Makuch], just published in the journal Astrobiology [open, DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1844] [DX], claims that Earth's Moon might have been habitable about one billion years after its formation, when pools of liquid water may have existed on the lunar surface. Today, of course, the Moon has no atmosphere and no liquid water. It's uninhabitable and certainly lifeless. But 3.5 billion years ago, a billion years after it formed, the lunar environment was quite different.

During this period of extreme outgassing from lunar magma, the Moon is estimated to have had an atmospheric pressure of 10 millibar, or one percent of Earth's current atmosphere. This is thicker than the current atmosphere on Mars, and would have been substantial enough for liquid water to pool on the lunar surface, perhaps for many millions of years.

Combine this with recent findings that lunar rocks are more water-rich than previously thought [DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2845] [DX], and we can hypothesize that lakes, even an ocean, could have stably existed on the Moon for a substantial amount of time. There is also evidence that the early Moon had a magnetic field [DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.012] [DX], which might have partially protected its surface from solar and cosmic radiation. This would have resulted in a temporarily habitable world, at a time when life on Earth had already gained a foothold.

Also at Motherboard and Astronomy Magazine.


Original Submission   Alternate Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Shire on Wednesday July 25 2018, @03:54PM (1 child)

    by The Shire (5824) on Wednesday July 25 2018, @03:54PM (#712432)

    You're doing the same thing they are - you're pushing the envelope of probability for the sake of click bait. It's a massive stretch to even say it's possible when then can't even prove that water was there, only that it might have. It's pointless speculation with zero evidence. Let's just stick to science instead of touchy feely wouldnt it be cool assertions.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday July 25 2018, @04:13PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday July 25 2018, @04:13PM (#712445) Journal

    Or it's a useful thought experiment that will help inform further scientific study of the Moon. Since we now have countries planning to put scientists on the surface full time.

    Also it's kinda hard for me to clickbait when you're already here.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]