Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 25 2018, @07:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-penny-saved-is-a-penny-earned dept.

Submitted via IRC for AndyTheAbsurd

Tesla has asked some suppliers to refund a portion of what the electric-car company has spent previously, an appeal that reflects the auto maker’s urgency to sustain operations during a critical production period.

This is bad news if you pre-ordered and were thinking about getting a refund but haven't gotten around to it yet.

Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-asks-suppliers-for-cash-back-to-help-turn-a-profit-1532301091 (Paywalled.)

See also: Miami Herald and electrek.co, which adds:

Update: Tesla sent us a full statement:

“Negotiation is a standard part of the procurement process, and now that we’re in a stronger position with Model 3 production ramping, it is a good time to improve our competitive advantage in this area. We’re focused on reaching a more sustainable long term cost basis, not just finding one-time reductions for this quarter, and that’s good for Tesla, our shareholders, and our suppliers who will also benefit from our increasing production volume and future growth opportunities. We asked fewer than 10 suppliers for a reduction in total capex project spend for long-term projects that began in 2016 but are still not complete, and any changes with these suppliers would improve our future cash flows, but not impact our ability to achieve profitability in Q3. The remainder of our discussions with suppliers are entirely focused on future parts price and design or process changes that will help us lower fundamental costs rather than prior period adjustments of capex projects. This is the right thing to do.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by cmdrklarg on Wednesday July 25 2018, @02:48PM (5 children)

    by cmdrklarg (5048) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 25 2018, @02:48PM (#712381)

    More Tesla FUD. I mean, it's not like all companies go back to their suppliers to ask for better (lower) pricing on the stuff they supply.

    They're not trying to turn a profit *right now*. They're trying to ramp up production. Profits come later.

    The shorters are losing more than their shorts I'd say.

    --
    The world is full of kings and queens who blind your eyes and steal your dreams.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @04:09PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @04:09PM (#712441)

    "We've got better negotiating leverage now so we can now demand our suppliers give us more favorable terms on long term spending than the ones we actually agreed to previously when they were supplying us in good faith." [unspoken... because we could go somewhere else if we need to.]

    yeah, nothing ethically problematic there. Implies nothing about their willingness to stand up to long term commitments on pre-agreed terms at all. I'm sure all companies try to welsh out of their agreements made when they're struggling. (Actually they probably do, granted, but that doesn't give Tesla a free pass.)

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @05:52PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @05:52PM (#712523)

      I think they are saying, something along the lines of:

      Hey, we think it'd be swell if you charged us less for this thing. You know, cause we will be getting more things soon, and it'd look better in bidding if we saw you were willing to deal.

      It does leave a bad taste in the mouth, but I don't think it is wrong to ask for a deal when it becomes apparent that you will be able to make more deals soon.

      • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday July 25 2018, @07:49PM

        by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday July 25 2018, @07:49PM (#712617)

        Tens of thousands of people pretty much do this for a living, and it's a full-time job (many full-time jobs, for big companies).

        I like what Tesla does, in general. Yet this is not "news"

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @08:33PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @08:33PM (#712654)

        Automotive companies asking for concessions on future purchases is commonplace and only natural. Tesla is asking for discounts for things they've already purchased which is quite another (ethically questionable) thing. Tesla should tread lightly. If they ever find themselves in a credit-constrained environment they will have difficulty finding suppliers and could be forced to pay upfront and/or at a premium.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @08:46PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @08:46PM (#712670)

    I mean, it's not like all companies go back to their suppliers to ask for better (lower) pricing on the stuff they supply.

    Stuff you're going to buy in the future sure. It is uncommon when you're asking for a rebate for stuff you've already purchased though.
    “Automakers often have brutal pricing demands on suppliers for future work, but retroactive rebates is not something we hear much about,”

    They're not trying to turn a profit *right now*.

    "Musk has told investors he expects to score profits and positive cash flow for the last two quarters of 2018."

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-tesla-stock-20180723-story.html [latimes.com]