Averting Toxic Chats: Computer Model Predicts When Online Conversations Turn Sour
The internet offers the potential for constructive dialogue and cooperation, but online conversations too often degenerate into personal attacks. In hopes that those attacks can be averted, researchers have created a model to predict which civil conversations might take a turn and derail.
After analyzing hundreds of exchanges between Wikipedia editors, the researchers developed a computer program that scans for warning signs in the language used by participants at the start of a conversation -- such as repeated, direct questioning or use of the word "you" -- to predict which initially civil conversations would go awry.
Early exchanges that included greetings, expressions of gratitude, hedges such as "it seems," and the words "I" and "we" were more likely to remain civil, the study found.
"We, as humans, have an intuition of whether a conversation is about to go awry, but it's often just a suspicion. We can't do it 100 percent of the time. We wonder if we can build systems to replicate or even go beyond this intuition," Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil[*] said.
The computer model, which also considered Google's Perspective, a machine-learning tool for evaluating "toxicity," was correct around 65 percent of the time. Humans guessed correctly 72 percent of the time.
[...] The study analyzed 1,270 conversations that began civilly but degenerated into personal attacks, culled from 50 million conversations across 16 million Wikipedia "talk" pages, where editors discuss articles or other issues. They examined exchanges in pairs, comparing each conversation that ended badly with one that succeeded on the same topic, so the results weren't skewed by sensitive subject matter such as politics.
[*] Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil: assistant professor of information science and co-author of the paper Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure. (pdf)
The technique sounds useful for non-internet conversations, too... is there an app for that?
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by VLM on Wednesday July 25 2018, @02:18PM (2 children)
Naah thats "from each according to their ability and to each according to their need" or whatever Ocasio-Cortez is saying this week.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @02:50PM (1 child)
Never mind that actual socialists seem to hate her guts. Ocasio-Cortez on “Meet the Press”: Double-talk, evasion and a disavowal of socialism [wsws.org] (July 2nd):
I think I am highly suspicious myself. Delay?! Are you mad, woman?! Well, I do not have a womb... however, let us hear from one of the original SJWs, William Lloyd Garrison [wikipedia.org]:
Quite the contrast with these supposed SJWs. They SJW about the most meaningless shit in the most impotent way possible. Their strategy seems to be to allow women's reproductive rights to be destroyed, and then as a consolation to working class women, encourage them to be angry with "all men" instead of with the Republican Party (for obvious reasons) and the Democratic Party for utterly fucking failing.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 25 2018, @05:21PM
Actual socialists say that in no way is the Swedish Nordic-model socialist.
http://www.socialistworld.net/index.php/international/europe/77-sweden/3752-Sweden--Is-Sweden-Socialist [socialistworld.net]