Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday July 26 2018, @04:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the un-bear-able dept.

The Irish Independent reports:

Campsites and lodges have emptied out after disappointed tourists were ordered to leave the heart of Yosemite National Park as firefighters battle to contain a huge wildfire.

The blaze just to the west has threatened the park's forest and sent up smoke that obscured grand vistas [...]

Over nearly two weeks, flames have churned through more than 57 square miles of timber in steep terrain of the Sierra Nevada just west of the park. The fire was just 25% contained on Tuesday.

The US National Park Service has a web page dedicated to the fire; the latest installment reports:

Beginning noon today, July 25, 2018, Yosemite Valley, Wawona, and the Mariposa Grove will be closed to all visitors due to the ongoing impacts of the Ferguson Fire. These closures include all hotels, campgrounds, and visitor services in Yosemite Valley and Wawona. The temporary closure is expected to last until Sunday, July 29, 2018.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 26 2018, @05:22AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 26 2018, @05:22AM (#712929)

    I thought they realized that it's natural to have fires (required for giant sequoia germination) and decided to not put them out anymore.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoiadendron_giganteum#Ecology/ [wikipedia.org]

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday July 26 2018, @12:21PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday July 26 2018, @12:21PM (#713040) Journal
    They're not doing some about-face on fires, they're protecting infrastructure. Burning down hotels isn't necessary for giant sequoia germination.
    • (Score: 3, Touché) by bob_super on Thursday July 26 2018, @05:37PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Thursday July 26 2018, @05:37PM (#713241)

      Having having observed the local Fauna, I beg to differ.
      The less hotels, the better for the plants.

  • (Score: 2) by toddestan on Friday July 27 2018, @10:46PM

    by toddestan (4982) on Friday July 27 2018, @10:46PM (#713861)

    They do realize that fire is an important part of the forest ecosystem, but they prefer to have smaller, controlled burns rather than gigantic, out of control raging infernos. There's also the problem that most fires are human-caused, which is a good reason to put them out - even the naturally occurring ones, as otherwise the forest would be burning way too often.

    Finally, in the case of this fire, with it being so hot and dry, it's not a given the trees would survive. Yes, the trees can handle wildfires, but only to a certain point.