SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Another German state plans switch back from Linux to Windows
The German state of Lower Saxony plans to follow Munich's example, and migrate a reported 13,000 users from Linux back to Windows.
Apparently undaunted by the cost of the Munich switch (which we reported in January could be as much as €100m), Lower Saxony is considering making the change in its tax office. The state seems to expect a much cheaper transition, with Heise (in German here) reporting the first-year budget is €5.9m, and another €7m further out.
The tax office argues its decision is driven by compatibility: field workers and teleworkers overwhelmingly use Windows, while the OpenSUSE variants are installed on its office workstations. The office workstations are also ageing and due for replacement, something that helped open the door for Windows.
Related: Linux Champion Munich Takes Decisive Step Towards Returning to Windows
Munich Switching From Linux to Windows 10
German Documentary on Relations Between Microsoft and Public Administration Now Available in English
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 28 2018, @04:44PM (2 children)
I use Devuan on my systems. Like Linux used to be, less complex, boots up and then gets out of the way for the application. Reduces headache and hassle for me.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 28 2018, @05:10PM
I've put Devuan on my embedded systems. SystemD for 25s faster boot times? These fuckers shouldn't reboot at all. SystemD for "seat management"? Lunacy. These machines have one job, controlling hardware, not running 50 keyboards and screens from the same computer.
Someone mentioned before how Linux pushed Windoze out of the data centers because it was the best server OS. So the distro people declare that every Linux should have facilities for desktops shoehorned in? I'd rather be running BSD, if the Linux kernel weren't so much more capable on all kinds of hardware.
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday July 29 2018, @07:54AM
Well, by sheer coincidence, I actually tried to install Devuan Ascii on a computer yesterday. I am a dedicated linux user, having used it solely since about 2005.
Firstly, it was like going back a decade. I know how to partition disks, but why should I have to? I also know how to light a fire by the methods used by our ancestors, but I wouldn't recommend it for every day use - we've mastered central heating. Devuan asks me to partition my disks. Every other distro in the last 10 years does this automatically, but not Devuan.
Most distros install in about 10-15 minutes with my internet connection (for updates) but not Devuan. Over twice as long but for no apparent reason. And finally it failed to install grub, so the entire thing would not boot until I got my hands dirty again and finished off doing what Devuan could not.
And it didn't install updates from the internet - unlike Debian from which it is supposedly forked, nor could I select English (GB) as only English (US) was given as an option. So for me it is a distro that I will quite happily live without.
I realise that many of you will respond that it works for you, and I am very pleased for you. But I am just as happy using a different distro that just does what it says and lets me get on with using the computer rather than playing with it. Systemd works, I've personally never heard of anyone having any of the problems that the doom-and-gloom merchants predicted would happen. I'm sure that they have occurred somewhere, but not in the numbers that were first imagined.
And that might be the same problem that Linux is having being accepted in Germany. It might be that the politicians are corrupt, but it might also be that there are enough oddball examples which make it simply harder to support for someone who doesn't want to partition disks manually, or would like to use their own language rather than one that is 'suggested' as being the correct one.
On the other side of the coin, the experience in Lower Saxony demonstrates the very reason that they initially elected to switch to Linux in the first instance. They are locked in to Window's proprietary formats with the inability to transfer data between Window's systems in the field and office systems running Linux. So their solution to that problem seems to be to roll over and accept the proprietary system.... I hope that make sense to them, it doesn't to me.