Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday July 28 2018, @02:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the dept.

After 25 years, military told to move from "expendable" to "reusable" rockets

Less than a year and a half has passed since SpaceX first flew a used first stage of a Falcon 9 rocket, but this achievement has already shaken up the glacial process of lawmaking and military budgeting. The final version of the defense budget bill for fiscal year 2019 will make both a symbolic and a significant policy change when it comes to reusable rockets.

The conference report from the US House and Senate calls for the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program of the Department of Defense, commonly known as the EELV program, to be named the "National Security Space Launch program" as of March 1, 2019. No longer will the military rely solely on expendable rockets.

Moreover, the report says the US Air Force must consider both expendable and reusable launch vehicles as part of its solicitation for military launch contracts. And in the event that a contract is solicited for a mission that a reusable launch vehicle is not eligible to compete for, the Air Force should report back to Congress with the reason why. The US House has already agreed to the conference report, and it should be taken up in the Senate next week. After that, it will need the president's signature to become law.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday July 28 2018, @05:01PM (1 child)

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Saturday July 28 2018, @05:01PM (#714031) Journal

    The Air Force in particular has been enthusiastic about SpaceX and will be an early customer for the Falcon Heavy. They want to save money. Falcon 9 reusability savings might be modest when compared to the upcoming fully reusable BFR, but Falcon Heavy is more reusable than Falcon 9.

    I'm pretty sure you don't want the B-52 to be your sole way of glassing a city. And the U.S. [wikipedia.org], China [wikipedia.org], and Russia [wikipedia.org] are all working on hypersonic missiles. Is it for the flash, or the bang?

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by JoeMerchant on Saturday July 28 2018, @05:33PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Saturday July 28 2018, @05:33PM (#714042)

    Flash gets you elected, bang puts a damper on the golfing schedule, I'm pretty sure they care more about the flash.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]