Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday July 28 2018, @10:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the breaking-chews dept.

The European Court of Justice has thrown out an appeal by the chocolate bar's maker, Nestlé, which argued that it owns the shape of the teatime treat.

Nestlé has spent more than a decade fighting to trademark the four-fingered wafer shape - something that rival Cadbury had fought hard against.

But Wednesday's judgement found that a previous court had been right to annul the decision by Europe's trademark group.

That could bring an end to the snack's protected European status - and a saga that has proved expensive for both sides.

It also takes the pressure off identical treats like Norway's Kvikk Lunsj - pronounced "quick lunch" and which has been around for 80 years - and opens the door to own-brand imitations at your local supermarket.

[...] Nestlé said that Wednesday's judgement was "not the end of the case" and that it believed the EU trademark office will side with the company anyway.

"We think the evidence proves that the familiar shape of our iconic four-finger Kit Kat is distinctive enough to be registered as an EU trademark," a spokesman said.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-44939819

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Sunday July 29 2018, @12:22PM (2 children)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Sunday July 29 2018, @12:22PM (#714317) Homepage Journal

    Have you ever been to California? Fresno, I held a rally in Fresno -- tremendous crowd, by the way, huge crowd for that one, they love me in Fresno. And all around Fresno it's farms. Wall to wall farms, like you wouldn't believe. Where they grow so many wonderful fruits and nuts. Amazing what they grow there. In what, honestly, it was a desert. Takes a lot of water. A lot of water, a lot of it comes from wells. So much coming out of those wells, the ground is actually sinking. Folks measured the ground, they say it's sinking from that. Not from Nestle.

    Beverly Hills, I have a little house on the grounds of the Beverly Hills Hotel. And in Beverly Hills, everybody has a swimming pool. Beautiful lawn. And so many fancy cars. Folks are very very rich there. But when they fill their swimming pools, they don't fill them with the Nestle water, with the Arrowhead water. And when they water their lawns, when they wash their cars -- obviously they have a guy to do that -- it's the same. They buy water from the city for that. The Arrowhead water is very special. Folks drink it, that's about all. And maybe they do the 8 glasses -- which, by the way, I think that's nonsense -- you think, "oh, they're drinking so much!" It's not so much.

    Palm Springs, you put the article, the link to the article, from the Palm Springs paper. If you've ever been to Palm Springs, California -- it looks like a junkyard. The wind turbines, wind farms. Each one is made by a different group from, all from China and from Germany, by the way -- not from here. And you look at all these windmills, half of them are broken, and they’re rusting and rotting. You know, you’re driving into Palm Springs, California, and it looks like a poor man’s version of Disneyland. It’s the worst thing you’ve ever seen. They want a better environment? Tear down the wind farms. They're a terrible eyesore and they're killing so many birds.

    But, water. So many golf courses around Palm Springs. They have golf courses like you wouldn't believe. Tremendous, tremendous number of courses. 124 golf courses, can you imagine that? Where, that's another part of California that would be a desert. Except for the water that's brought in. A lot from underground. And it takes a tremendous amount of water to keep those courses looking PERFECTO. And I'll tell you, they don't water them with Nestle. They don't water them with Arrowhead.

    Folks in California, so-called environmentalists, getting up in arms about Nestle. Saying they're taking a lot of water. But you look at the whole thing, Nestle is just a drop in the bucket. Can we say that? And folks saying, "oh, they don't have a permit!" They don't have a permit, that's true. But a judge said that they're OK. That they did all the legal they need to do. As it says in that article.

    Michigan, Nestle has a plant in Michigan. Lots of folks working there. And they expanded that plant, they hired more people. Michigan, as everybody knows, so many folks there need the bottled water. Terrible situation in Flint, right? And Nestle has a permit. But -- this is unbelievable -- the so-called environmentalists are up in arms. And sued the company. Because they wanted Nestle to pay more for the permit. Which they got at a very good price, I think it was around $200. And they sued because they said Nestle would be pumping too much water, that it's harming the lakes. Which, maybe you've heard of them, they're called the Great Lakes. Because they're HUGE. These are some of the biggest lakes around -- possibly the very biggest. But Nestle, according to the obstructionists, they wanted to pump too much water. Incredible!!!

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 29 2018, @01:23PM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 29 2018, @01:23PM (#714341) Journal

    I've been damned near everywhere. If you're an American citizen, it's VERY likely that I've been within 50 miles of your house. (I can figure those odds a couple of different ways, of course, but it works pretty much any way you want to work the numbers.) Yes, I've seen the sights you describe. And, I have always maintained that it takes a bunch of lack wits to pump all that water into a desert to grow stuff that would grow just as well somewhere else on the continent.

    A drop in the bucket you say, and seem to excuse Nestle because of that. How about we end ALL of the stupidity. Cut all the subsidies on the federal and the state level for farmers who can't get by with their "fair share" of water. Farmers who are growing crops that are suitable and/or adapted to near desert environments maybe get a break - strawberry farmers lose their subsidies. I mean, WTF? Strawberries grow almost everywhere that isn't desert. True, they are a rather high risk crop, but the risk is even greater out there in the desert.

    Stop watering all the lawns in Cal. That is so damned ignorant - and in Arizona too. FFS, people move to the desert, then they want to maintain a lush Kentucky field of grass? Jesus H. Christ, that is stupid beyond description. Want to live in a desert? Plant a nice rock garden, with a few cactus (cacti?) and maybe a few bushes that don't need to be watered.

    Again - Nestle can build a damned water treatment plant, just about anywhere between Bimidji, Mn, all the way down to New Orleans, and pump all the water out of the Mississippi they want - and NO ONE will ever miss the water!

    I'm as likely to buy water labeled "Mississippi Mud" as I am to buy "Sexy Spring in Cal". Which, in both cases, has a chance of near zero.

    • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Sunday July 29 2018, @01:42PM

      by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Sunday July 29 2018, @01:42PM (#714345) Homepage Journal

      Folks tell me my tweets are too long. And possibly that one was too long for you. But I said that Nestle has a plant in Michigan -- where they have more water than the Mississippi, more water than anyplace -- and the obstructionists tried to stop them. Over not paying a lot of money -- in a state where nobody pays a lot. And, unbelievably, over supposedly pumping too much water!!