Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Saturday July 28 2018, @11:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the older-engine-plan-backfires dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Among many things that former head of the EPA Scott Pruitt did during his time at the agency was to cease enforcement of emissions standards for so-called "Glider" trucks. Gliders are new heavy truck chassis that have older, less technologically advanced and emissions-compliant engines installed into them.

The Obama administration sought to close the loopholes that allow gliders to be built and sold in significant numbers in an effort to curb their pollution but Pruitt opted to toss that aside in the name of business. We've covered the glider situation in the past, but the big news is that the new acting head of the EPA, a former coal lobbyist, has moved to reinstate the Obama regulations after a court insisted that they be enforced once again.

[...] Many trucking fleets like gliders because they are often cheaper to maintain and run than modern trucks, but the amount of pollutants that they emit can be hundreds of times more than the federal standards would allow. The laws that permitted gliders to be built in the first place were designed primarily to reduce the number of wrecked trucks going into scrap yards, instead giving their engines new homes. That kind of backfired.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 30 2018, @04:22AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 30 2018, @04:22AM (#714619)

    What's your point about NOx and cities? That's where most people live. Air pollution kills.

  • (Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Monday July 30 2018, @11:40AM

    by Aiwendil (531) on Monday July 30 2018, @11:40AM (#714678) Journal

    That you shouldn't use long haul trucks in cities was my point.

    Or put another way - the trucks will mainly spend their time travelling between cities so their NOx profile should be judged differently from a car that will spend most of their time in cities.
    (Quite frankly the best would be to have reloading stations in the suburbs where long haul trucks and short haul (eletrical) trucks meet)